2014
DOI: 10.1162/rest_a_00350
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Causal Interpretation of Extensive and Intensive Margin Effects in Generalized Tobit Models

Abstract: Abstract:The usual decomposition of effects in corner solution models into extensive and intensive margins is generally incompatible with a causal interpretation. This paper proposes a decomposition based on the joint distribution of potential outcomes which is meaningful in a causal sense. The difference between decompositions can be substantial and yield diametrically opposed results, as shown in a standard Tobit model example. In a generalized Tobit application exploring the effect of reducing firm entry re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparing our set‐up with that of Staub (), first, Staub () used the term ‘switchers’ instead of changers. Second, Staub () considered mainly Y with P ( Y =0)>0 without splitting Y into Q and Y* and then examined the sample selection case Y=QY* briefly as a generalization. Third, Staub () pursued non‐parametric bounds for the above effects, whereas we focus on point identification adopting linear models.…”
Section: Non‐parametric Causality and Various Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Comparing our set‐up with that of Staub (), first, Staub () used the term ‘switchers’ instead of changers. Second, Staub () considered mainly Y with P ( Y =0)>0 without splitting Y into Q and Y* and then examined the sample selection case Y=QY* briefly as a generalization. Third, Staub () pursued non‐parametric bounds for the above effects, whereas we focus on point identification adopting linear models.…”
Section: Non‐parametric Causality and Various Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, Staub () considered mainly Y with P ( Y =0)>0 without splitting Y into Q and Y* and then examined the sample selection case Y=QY* briefly as a generalization. Third, Staub () pursued non‐parametric bounds for the above effects, whereas we focus on point identification adopting linear models. Fourth, Staub () also explored point identification; however, the entities identified include error term conditional means whose estimation was not addressed, whereas much of this paper is on estimating such terms.…”
Section: Non‐parametric Causality and Various Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Note that the extensive margin effect is the change in the probability of participation times the average outcome of participants. This may overstate the true causal effect if those at the margin of participation have below average outcomes once they participate (Staub, 2013).…”
Section: Decomposing the Mean Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The derived LM test is similar to the widely used Jarque 1 An example is the estimation of gravity models of bilateral trade flows with missing and/or zero trade. Here, the assumption of bivariate normality turns out important for deriving comparative static results with respect changes in the external and internal margin of trade following Yen and Rosinski (2008) [1] and Staub (2014) [2]. 2 There is also work available that proposes normality tests for the Tobit model (see Skeels and Vella, 1999 [4] and Drukker, 2002 [5]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%