2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.07.091
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A cathode material based on the iron fluoride with an ultra-thin Li3FeF6 protective layer for high-capacity Li-ion batteries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The diameter of the semicircle is associated with the charge‐transfer resistance ( R ct ) and the sloping line in the low‐frequency region is related to the diffusion impedance of Li + in the solid electrode. The FeOF/rGO electrode exhibited a smaller R ct (77.1 Ω; Table S2 in the Supporting Information) than that of bare FeOF (126.4 Ω), which indicated better electrode reaction kinetics of FeOF/rGO and was in agreement with the electroperformance results in Figure c and d. Moreover, the slopes of the lines for these two electrodes are similar, which indicates that the rGO layer does not hamper the transport of Li + …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The diameter of the semicircle is associated with the charge‐transfer resistance ( R ct ) and the sloping line in the low‐frequency region is related to the diffusion impedance of Li + in the solid electrode. The FeOF/rGO electrode exhibited a smaller R ct (77.1 Ω; Table S2 in the Supporting Information) than that of bare FeOF (126.4 Ω), which indicated better electrode reaction kinetics of FeOF/rGO and was in agreement with the electroperformance results in Figure c and d. Moreover, the slopes of the lines for these two electrodes are similar, which indicates that the rGO layer does not hamper the transport of Li + …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…The FeOF/rGO electrode exhibited as maller R ct (77.1 W; Ta ble S2 in the Supporting Information) than that of bare FeOF (126.4 W), which indicatedb etter electrode reactionk ineticso f FeOF/rGO and was in agreement with the electroperformance results in Figure 5c and d. Moreover,t he slopes of the lines for these two electrodes are similar, which indicates that the rGO layer does not hamper the transport of Li + . [27] The enhanced lithium-storage properties of FeOF/rGO could be derived from the following properties of the materials: 1) The starfish-like FeOF nanocrystals constructed from well-defined nanorods are favorable for enlarging the area accessible to the electrolyte, while greatlys hortening the lithium-ion diffusion pathways. 2) Such an architecture,a long with the stretchable rGO sheets,c an, to some extent,w ithstandv olume changes and avoid agglomeration during the Li + insertion/extraction process;t hus ensuring the integrity of the nanostructured electrode.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The particular peak (1230 cm À 1 ) in FCN is considered to be derived from CÀ N stretching vibrations, which imply the nitrogen atoms were doped into the carbon skeleton. [67,68] Exothermic peaks at 400°C are considered to be caused by the oxidation of FeF 3 to Fe 2 O 3 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The element mapping of those two samples were similar to that of FCN, the larger distribution region of F atoms indicated that there are also by-products. [67,68]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, there are three diminutive peaks at 723.32 eV, 713.24 eV and 710.25 eV. The 723.32 eV peak can be attributed to the Fe-F bonds [44]. For the K2p spectrum ( Fig.…”
Section: Xps and Tga Testsmentioning
confidence: 94%