2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2009.10.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A categorical modeling approach to analyzing new product adoption and usage in the context of the building-materials industry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In construction, the adoption of systematic innovations is generally impeded by the decentralized nature of the industry, and varies both regionally and across firms of different sizes [100]. Consequently, individual firms or subsectors often establish particular work flows and material palettes which are used across all projects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In construction, the adoption of systematic innovations is generally impeded by the decentralized nature of the industry, and varies both regionally and across firms of different sizes [100]. Consequently, individual firms or subsectors often establish particular work flows and material palettes which are used across all projects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study showed an excessive number of zeros in the outcome variables (64.9% for M2, 71.9% for M9, 85.75% for M14, 85.75% for M17 and 73.25% for Mbwazirume). The inability to account for the extra \pull" exerted by the disproportionately high response of zeros might result in biased parameter estimates and misleading inferences [Ganguly et al (2010)]. For this reason, the ZIP regression model [Vuong (1989)] was applied in this study.…”
Section: The Empirical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Euronano report (Meyer et al, 2008) identifies nanomedicine as one of the four major broad nano‐fields in exploring the economic potential of nanotechnology. Other major reports and articles related to NBMS include the ESF report (ESF, 2005), Roadmaps report (Meyer and Persson, 1998), European Technology Platform report (Tomellini et al, 2005), Ernest and Shetty (Ganguly et al, 2010), Rafols and Meyer (Rafols and Meyer, 2007), and Wagner and colleagues (Michalakelis et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples of nanomedicine given in this report are: drug delivery; drugs and therapy; in vivo diagnostics; in vitro diagnostics; biomaterials; tissue engineering/regenerative medicine; active implants. The forward looking report of EMRC (ESF, 2005) defines the field as ‘the science and technology of diagnosing, treating and preventing disease and traumatic injury, of relieving pain, and of preserving and improving human health, using molecular tools and molecular knowledge of the human body.’ Ernest and Shetty (Ganguly et al, 2010) consider NBMS as the direct application of the convergence of nanotech and biotech and take the same definition of NBMS as the EMRC report. Bibliometric analysis might define the boundaries of nanobio, nanobiomedical, or nanomedicine from the perspective of search terms, which are then used to address and retrieve publications and patents in the domain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%