2009
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.0903.4414
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A categorical invariant for cubic threefolds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most interesting cases of index one are those of even genus g X = 1 2 H 3 +1, for which Mukai [Muk92] constructed an exceptional rank two vector bundle E 2 of slope − 1 2 ; in these cases our Theorem refers to the semiorthogonal decomposition D b (X) = Ku(X), E 2 , O X . The result is straightforward from previous descriptions of Ku(X) for g X ∈ {10, 12}, due to [BMMS12] for g X = 8, and new for g X = 6.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The most interesting cases of index one are those of even genus g X = 1 2 H 3 +1, for which Mukai [Muk92] constructed an exceptional rank two vector bundle E 2 of slope − 1 2 ; in these cases our Theorem refers to the semiorthogonal decomposition D b (X) = Ku(X), E 2 , O X . The result is straightforward from previous descriptions of Ku(X) for g X ∈ {10, 12}, due to [BMMS12] for g X = 8, and new for g X = 6.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Their deformation type is determined by d = H 3 ∈ {1, 2, 3, 4, 5}. The result is straightforward from prior descriptions of Ku(X) for d ≥ 4, due to [BMMS12] for cubic threefolds (d = 3) and new for d ∈ {1, 2}. The most interesting cases of index one are those of even genus g X = 1 2 H 3 +1, for which Mukai [Muk92] constructed an exceptional rank two vector bundle E 2 of slope − 1 2 ; in these cases our Theorem refers to the semiorthogonal decomposition D b (X) = Ku(X), E 2 , O X .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Notice that if X is a smooth cubic threefold, the equivalence class of a notable admissible subcategory A X (the orthogonal complement of {O X , O X (1)}) corresponds to the isomorphism class of J(X) as principally polarized abelian variety [BMMS09]; the proof is based on the reconstruction of the Fano variety and the techniques used there are far away from the subject of this paper.…”
Section: Reconstruction Of the Intermediate Jacobianmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their deformation type is determined by d = H 3 ∈ {1, 2, 3, 4, 5}. The result is straightforward from prior descriptions of Ku(X) for d ≥ 4 in [Orl91,BO95], due to [BMMS12] for cubic threefolds (d = 3) and new for d ∈ {1, 2}. The most interesting cases of index one are those of even genus g X = 1 2 H 3 + 1, for which Mukai [Muk92] constructed an exceptional rank two vector bundle E 2 of slope − 1 2 ; in these cases our Theorem refers to the semiorthogonal decomposition D b (X) = Ku(X), E 2 , O X .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…In the case of cubic fourfolds, as mentioned above, they conjecturally determine rationality of X. Finally, they are naturally related to Torelli type questions: on the one hand, they still encode much of the cohomological information of X; on the other hand, one can hope to recover X from Ku(X) (in some cases when equipped with some additional data); see [BMMS12] for such a result for cubic threefolds, and [HR19] for many hypersurfaces, including cubic fourfolds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%