Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2003.04.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A catchment-based water resource decision-support tool for the United Kingdom

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A great deal of analysis of the relationships between catchment characteristics and hydrology has been undertaken during previous research aimed at producing methods for flood estimation at ungauged sites (Institute of Hydrology, 1999;Marshall, 2000), for water resources (Holmes et al, 2005) and for continuous hydrological simulation (Lee et al, 2006). In this paper, the utility of catchment characteristics to predict at-site physical habitatdischarge relationships was assessed and compared with that of cross-sectional information; the results show that estimation of W UA /W W2 v. P rev relationships using catchment characteristics can be improved using cross-sectional variables.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A great deal of analysis of the relationships between catchment characteristics and hydrology has been undertaken during previous research aimed at producing methods for flood estimation at ungauged sites (Institute of Hydrology, 1999;Marshall, 2000), for water resources (Holmes et al, 2005) and for continuous hydrological simulation (Lee et al, 2006). In this paper, the utility of catchment characteristics to predict at-site physical habitatdischarge relationships was assessed and compared with that of cross-sectional information; the results show that estimation of W UA /W W2 v. P rev relationships using catchment characteristics can be improved using cross-sectional variables.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, 63 sites ( Fig.1) and a total of 508 cross-sections (Table 1) were included in further analysis. Data from Low Flows 2000 (Holmes et al, 2005), the Flood Estimation Handbook (Institute of Hydrology, 1999) and Intelligent River Network (Dawson et al, 2002) were used to generate catchment characteristics for each site (Table 2). Cross-sectional-based hydraulic modelling of depths and velocities at each site allowed a suite of hydraulic properties to be calculated for each cross-section (Table 3).…”
Section: Sitesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…licensed abstraction rates, discharge consents and reservoir release profiles) at locations in the catchments of gauging stations, using the process described in Holmes et al (2005). The influence data was that used in the EA's 'Initial Characterisation of Waterbodies' project (UKTAG, 2010).…”
Section: Artificial Influencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regionalisation methods often employ a Region of Influence (Burn, 1990) approach, which enables prediction at ungauged locations through data transfer from poolinggroups of hydrologically-similar catchments. In the UK, pooling-group methods are used for flood frequency estimation (the Flood Estimation Handbook, FEH: Institute of Hydrology, 1999) and flow duration curve estimation ("Low Flows" software: Holmes et al 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The changing hydrologic regimes induced by climate change and resulting in variations in available water resources will strongly influence not only the eco-environment and socio-economic development of the local region, but also the downstream areas [5][6][7][8]. Thus, understanding the spatiotemporal responses of water resources to the changing climate is crucial to identifying future water availability and developing sustainable management plans [9][10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%