Proceedings 2001 Pacific Rim International Symposium on Dependable Computing
DOI: 10.1109/prdc.2001.992714
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A case study: validation of guidance control software requirements for completeness, consistency and fault tolerance

Abstract: In this paper, we discuss a case study performed for validating a Natural Language (NL) based software requirements specification (SRS)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most recent studies of completeness of specification in the literature are related to the application of some formal method for analysis and validation or often related to algebraic specifications [28]. For example Sheldon et al [29] have combined Z, Statecharts, and Stochastic Activity Network to validate a Natural Language software requirements specifications for completeness, consistency, and fault-tolerance.…”
Section: Completenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most recent studies of completeness of specification in the literature are related to the application of some formal method for analysis and validation or often related to algebraic specifications [28]. For example Sheldon et al [29] have combined Z, Statecharts, and Stochastic Activity Network to validate a Natural Language software requirements specifications for completeness, consistency, and fault-tolerance.…”
Section: Completenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The investigation should ask whether procedures were followed and whether there was appropriate control to prevent distribution of the defective product. The validation of the system subjected to various system parameters such as consistency and fault tolerance are tested for the detected defect [12]. The magnitude of the investigation should correlate with the significance and risk of the problem.…”
Section: A Failure Investigationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many works (e.g., [11], [12], [13] and [14]) aim at studying the quality attributes of software requirements, such as correctness, completeness, consistency, clarity, and feasibility.…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%