1996
DOI: 10.1016/0950-3293(95)00018-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A case study of the use of experimental design and multivariate analysis in product improvement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Treatment A is preferable to maintain or improve the sensory qualities of the product. The data also show that experimental design and sensory evaluation work well in combination as has been shown in various previous studies (10,15,16). However, in experiments involving evaluation by a sensory panel, it is important to ensure that the differences generated by the experimental variations are sufficiently large to be detected by the sensory panelists.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Treatment A is preferable to maintain or improve the sensory qualities of the product. The data also show that experimental design and sensory evaluation work well in combination as has been shown in various previous studies (10,15,16). However, in experiments involving evaluation by a sensory panel, it is important to ensure that the differences generated by the experimental variations are sufficiently large to be detected by the sensory panelists.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…The relationship between the investigated variables and the sensory quality of the product determined by sensory evaluation is then modeled by multivariate methods such as PLS or MLR. Another common way is to use ANOVA in combination with principal component analysis (10).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a fractional factorial design of seven factors and 12 response variables (sensory attributes), Ellekjaer et al 8 performed separate ANOVA on all the single sensory responses, using a cross-classification model for samples, assessors and their two-factor interactions. Responses that were found to separate between samples, as identified by the ANOVA, were subject to a principal component analysis (PCA), see e.g.…”
Section: The Real World Is Multivariatementioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the so called internal preference mapping only uses consumers' ratings, and it is applied to discover market segments formed by consumers with similar tastes that can be differentiated from other segments (Van Kleef, Van Trijp, and Luning, 2006). The available methods for tackling these problems employ a combination of analysis of variance (ANOVA, see for instance (Lea, Naes, Rodbotten, 1997)), principal component analysis (PCA, see (Ellekjaer, Ilseng, and Naes, 1996)), and regression (McEwan, 1996;Tenenhaus, Pagès, Ambroisine, and Guinot, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%