The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2014
DOI: 10.1080/10691316.2014.925415
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Case Study of Librarian Outreach to Scientists: Collaborative Research and Scholarly Communication in Conservation Biology

Abstract: Global collaboration is increasingly important across universities and conservation biology organizations. In this example, a partnership resulted in the creation of a short-course aimed at exploring communication forms and digital tools that facilitate scholarly communication in conservation biology. Questions the authors hoped to answer in the course were: What are the benefits and limitations of these tools? How can researchers in conservation biology use these methods to share data, show impact and connect… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, faculties are often required to provide metrics throughout the promotion and tenure process to measure their engagement and impact within their discipline. Because they are unaware that librarians can assist with compiling and analyzing these types of bibliometric data, they do not receive training on how to properly gather the scholarly metrics used in these decisions (Adams & Bullard, 2014;Galloway, Pease, & Rauh, 2013). Furthermore, with the scholarly communication environment continually evolving, providing workshops to keep faculty up-to-date on new and emerging trends was another opportunity for librarians to participate.…”
Section: Facultymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, faculties are often required to provide metrics throughout the promotion and tenure process to measure their engagement and impact within their discipline. Because they are unaware that librarians can assist with compiling and analyzing these types of bibliometric data, they do not receive training on how to properly gather the scholarly metrics used in these decisions (Adams & Bullard, 2014;Galloway, Pease, & Rauh, 2013). Furthermore, with the scholarly communication environment continually evolving, providing workshops to keep faculty up-to-date on new and emerging trends was another opportunity for librarians to participate.…”
Section: Facultymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intra-university engagement between librarians and academics for this purpose has been well-established since the 1990s, and has often taken the form of collaborative teaching of information research and academic skills for undergraduates (Haynes, 1996;Smith, 2011;Wilkes, Godwin, & Gurney, 2015). There has also been an increasing trend towards institution-wide collaborations which emphasise the intertwined nature of research, writing and disciplinary content (Adams & Bullard, 2014;Einfalt & Turley, 2013).…”
Section: Traditional Intra-university Collaborationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…26 Adams and Bullard went a step further and created a short course in Social Media enabled scientific communication for conservation biologists that included altmetrics. 27 This course provided basic information on existing altmetric tools at the time the course was offered as well as collaboration tools and open access scholarly communication. However, the course did not identify which tools would maximize impact using altmetrics.…”
Section: Strategically Designing An Online Presence For Research Impamentioning
confidence: 99%