2009
DOI: 10.5038/2375-0901.12.4.6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Case Study of Job Access and Reverse Commute Programs in the Chicago, Kansas City, and San Francisco Metropolitan Regions

Abstract: The 1996 federal welfare-to-work legislation generated significant

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 23 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this light, the relaxation of vehicle asset limits should be seen as a victory for low-income travelers, given the role that it had in improving vehicle access to low-income single parents (27,28), the theoretical importance of vehicle access to meeting certain sets of travel needs (32,33), and the demonstration in this paper of the growing mobility advantages of automobile commuting. The findings suggest the benefits of policies to further relax vehicle asset limits and to mitigate the cost burdens of personal vehicle use for poor travelers, whether this mitigation is done through a focus on particular costs, such as those from automobile insurance (34), or through state-funded automobility programs (35). Some population groups-particularly the carless-have become increasingly reliant on public transit for access to work.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this light, the relaxation of vehicle asset limits should be seen as a victory for low-income travelers, given the role that it had in improving vehicle access to low-income single parents (27,28), the theoretical importance of vehicle access to meeting certain sets of travel needs (32,33), and the demonstration in this paper of the growing mobility advantages of automobile commuting. The findings suggest the benefits of policies to further relax vehicle asset limits and to mitigate the cost burdens of personal vehicle use for poor travelers, whether this mitigation is done through a focus on particular costs, such as those from automobile insurance (34), or through state-funded automobility programs (35). Some population groups-particularly the carless-have become increasingly reliant on public transit for access to work.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%