2015
DOI: 10.1080/1533015x.2015.1109487
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Case Study of Indoor Garden-Based Learning With Hydroponics and Aquaponics: Evaluating Pro-Environmental Knowledge, Perception, and Behavior Change

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Opportunely, other studies have demonstrated that outdoor EE has led to gains in science knowledge for all students (Jon Schneller et al, 2015;Wells et al, 2015). In our study, those findings seem to hold true for ECBD students specifically, suggesting outdoor EE can help teachers supplement science instruction for all students using a single approach.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Opportunely, other studies have demonstrated that outdoor EE has led to gains in science knowledge for all students (Jon Schneller et al, 2015;Wells et al, 2015). In our study, those findings seem to hold true for ECBD students specifically, suggesting outdoor EE can help teachers supplement science instruction for all students using a single approach.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…For example, reading books about nature (Mobley, Vagias, & DeWard, 2010), watching nature documentaries (Arendt & Matthes, 2016; Hofman & Hughes, 2018; Holbert, Kwak, & Shah, 2003) or short nature videos (Zelenski, Dopko, & Capaldi, 2015) have all been shown to be positively associated with greater pro‐environmental behaviour and/or greater intention to engage in pro‐nature conservation behaviours. Additional determinants of environmentally responsible behaviour include having knowledge of nature and holding positive attitudes towards nature such as valuing and being concerned for the environment (Chan, Hon, Chan, & Okumus, 2014; Gungor, Chen, Wu, Zhou, & Shirkey, 2018; Otto & Pensini, 2017; Schneller, Schofield, Frank, Hollister, & Mamuszka, 2015). It is important to note that these are all individual indicators, which have been evidenced across a diverse array of social and cultural contexts (including non‐European contexts).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The spatial domain, in turn, needs to be redefined due to technological advancements and social innovation, as the traditional view on gardening activities has been complemented by a variety of approaches, incl. indoor and outdoor schoolyard gardens, and distant stakeholder-designed community spaces (Schneller et al, 2015;Malberg Dyg, Wistoft, 2018). Variety, in turn, is defined by climate, financial opportunities, and the capacity of teachers to undertake practical activities in a garden, especially among younger staff (Passy, 2014;Ohly et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is important to note that outdoor school-by-setting is not strictly determining criteria for defining school gardening, as innovative practices include various in-class, lab-or farm-based activities too as part of the formal educational curriculum. For instance, gardening programmes can include systems of hydroponics and aquaponics that can be maintained indoors (Schneller et al, 2015) or animal and plant farms located on a distance from school (Malberg Dyg, Wistoft, 2018).…”
Section: Spatial Domainmentioning
confidence: 99%