2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2003.10.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A case study of contaminants on military ranges: Camp Edwards, Massachusetts, USA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
110
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 184 publications
(111 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
110
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Contamination of soil and groundwater with high explosive (HE) compounds has been observed at many military training ranges (Jenkins et al, 2001;Pennington et al, 2002;Clausen et al, 2004). The primary source of HE contamination at these sites is residues from detonation of military munitions including projectiles (e.g., mortar and artillery rounds), grenades, land mines, aerial bombs, and missiles, as well as ordnance demolition charges.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contamination of soil and groundwater with high explosive (HE) compounds has been observed at many military training ranges (Jenkins et al, 2001;Pennington et al, 2002;Clausen et al, 2004). The primary source of HE contamination at these sites is residues from detonation of military munitions including projectiles (e.g., mortar and artillery rounds), grenades, land mines, aerial bombs, and missiles, as well as ordnance demolition charges.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These MCs, as compared to the non-explosive MCs, are generally well-studied on a generic or macro level but poorly understood under most site-specific conditions. An extensive study by Pennington et al (2001Pennington et al ( , 2003Pennington et al ( , 2004Pennington et al ( , 2005Pennington et al ( , and 2006) and Clausen et al (2004Clausen et al ( , 2006 at Camp Edwards, Massachusetts, identified a list of MCs that were considered important to monitor. While MCs are the primary chemicals typically associated with ranges because of their use in munitions, chemicals other than those included on the 'standard' list of MCs also may exist on ranges (e.g., herbicides).…”
Section: Identification Of Range-related Chemicals Of Potential Concernmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These ranges can no longer be treated as fire-and-forget facilities. Lawsuits at both the Massachusetts Military Reservation ( USEPA 2000, Clausen et al 2004) and Eagle River Flats in Alaska (USAEC 2005) have resulted from the environmental impacts of training activities. These lawsuits and the potential of others to restrict or eliminate training activities have triggered a need to quantify the impact that the detonation of munitions, both live-fire and blow-in-place, have on ranges.…”
Section: Tablesmentioning
confidence: 99%