2006
DOI: 10.1300/j098v07n02_05
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Case Study of Balanced Scorecard Implementation in a Malaysian Company

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Robinson et al (2005) found that construction engineering organisations reported significant challenges in the implementation of the BSC in terms of planning, deployment and assessment and review stages which includes the motivation for performance management, leadership and resources, communication mechanisms, measurement and data collection techniques and the role of knowledge management. This was corroborated by Othman et al (2006) who found that there are likely to be problems in implementation when a top down approach is used, particularly if there is a lack of buy‐in and understanding at the lower levels, and a lack of employee motivation as the scorecard may not address human relations norms (see also Johanson et al 2006:846). A number of studies show that there is not a one size fits all application of the BSC.…”
Section: Balanced Scorecard Development In the Public Sectormentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, Robinson et al (2005) found that construction engineering organisations reported significant challenges in the implementation of the BSC in terms of planning, deployment and assessment and review stages which includes the motivation for performance management, leadership and resources, communication mechanisms, measurement and data collection techniques and the role of knowledge management. This was corroborated by Othman et al (2006) who found that there are likely to be problems in implementation when a top down approach is used, particularly if there is a lack of buy‐in and understanding at the lower levels, and a lack of employee motivation as the scorecard may not address human relations norms (see also Johanson et al 2006:846). A number of studies show that there is not a one size fits all application of the BSC.…”
Section: Balanced Scorecard Development In the Public Sectormentioning
confidence: 85%
“…This also highlights the difficulty in meeting the needs of the LGA's various stakeholders whose main concern may centre on expectations of the LGA providing better community service rather than improved financial performance. In addition, the introduction of a new BSC system in a complex environment presents real challenges in leadership and motivation of employees, especially where this is implemented through a top down approach leading to a lack of buy‐in by middle and lower levels of management (Othman et al 2006). The complexity of the LGA coupled with a top down approach to implementation also led to communication problems and difficulties in measurement.…”
Section: Conclusion Limitations and Further Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Any problem that can appear in the implementation of the strategy leads to achieve unbalanced situation between financial and non-financial measures (Anand et al 2005). BSC has had different meanings at different times (Othman et al 2006). In some cases, organizations do not understand what exactly the BSC is and what its implementation involves (Othman, 2009).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature review was conducted with the main goal to searching case studies (Othman, R. et al (2006), Nabitz, U. et al (2001) Marques, A. I, et al (2011)) that are related to PM systems or models. First, a brief consideration of the effort of performance management systems adoption is carried out.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%