Volume 1: Active Control of Aerospace Structure; Motion Control; Aerospace Control; Assistive Robotic Systems; Bio-Inspired Sys 2014
DOI: 10.1115/dscc2014-6257
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Case Study in Control Methods for Active Magnetic Bearings

Abstract: Active magnetic bearings (AMBs) provide support to rotating machinery through magnetic forces which are regulated through active feedback control. As AMBs continue to establish themselves as a proven technology, many classical and modern techniques are being employed to address the design of the control law. The current work studies three of the controller design techniques which are common in the literature for AMB applications: PID, LQG, and μ-synthesis. A controller is designed for an AMB system using each … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The experimental results show that the μ-synthesis control can effectively suppress the aerodynamic load disturbance of the rotor and ensure the stability and stability margin of the system. Alexander et al [198] and others respectively designed PID, LQG and μ-synthesis controllers and applied them on the maglev rotor experimental platform. Through experimental comparison, it was found that the control effect of μ-synthesis controller was better than that of PID control and LQG control, and μsynthesis control The ability to suppress the vibration of the flexible mode of the rotor is better.…”
Section: Robust Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experimental results show that the μ-synthesis control can effectively suppress the aerodynamic load disturbance of the rotor and ensure the stability and stability margin of the system. Alexander et al [198] and others respectively designed PID, LQG and μ-synthesis controllers and applied them on the maglev rotor experimental platform. Through experimental comparison, it was found that the control effect of μ-synthesis controller was better than that of PID control and LQG control, and μsynthesis control The ability to suppress the vibration of the flexible mode of the rotor is better.…”
Section: Robust Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Control techniques have also been applied to rotating machines over the years for vibration mitigation purposes, as presented by Karakaya and Karakas (2014), Pesch et al (2014), Jung and DeSmidt (2018), Camino and Santos (2019), and Carvalho et al (2021). In general, vibration control of rotating machines can be performed based on passive, semi-active, and active strategies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Excitation of these modes by the AMB controller is avoided by controller roll-off, which is achieved through performance weighting, as detailed in Section 2.4. More detail on the mathematical modeling and system identification of the AMB test rig can be found in the earlier study [19]. The open-loop AMB system, including the bias current, which effects the position and current stiffnesses, is inherently unstable.…”
Section: Experimental Test Rigmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rotor weight and an unbalance force at 2000 RPM are applied. A static unbalance is assumed to be distributed to the AMB force centers, the magnitude of which was originally tuned to rotor orbits in [19]. Initially, the TD bearing is modeled as a linear stiffness and damping on the FE rotor at the TD bearing nodes with a discontinuity to reflect if the rotor is in contact.…”
Section: Contact Force Estimation and Performance Weightmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation