2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2009.06.095
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A case study for learning behaviors in mobile robotics by evolutionary fuzzy systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These variables usually need to be obtained through a preprocessing of the sensors data. For example, in [3], [4] two successful approaches to learn fuzzy rules for the control of a robot in two different tasks were described. In both cases, the learned rules were conventional fuzzy rules and all the input variables were defined by a human expert.…”
Section: Quantified Fuzzy Rules (Qfrs) a Motivation For Mobile Rmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These variables usually need to be obtained through a preprocessing of the sensors data. For example, in [3], [4] two successful approaches to learn fuzzy rules for the control of a robot in two different tasks were described. In both cases, the learned rules were conventional fuzzy rules and all the input variables were defined by a human expert.…”
Section: Quantified Fuzzy Rules (Qfrs) a Motivation For Mobile Rmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [12] 360 laser sensor beams are used as input data, and are heuristically combined into 8 sectors as inputs to the learning algorithm. On the other hand, in [9,13,14,15,16,18,19,21] the input variables of the learning algorithm are defined by an expert. Moreover, in [13,14,16,18,20] the evaluation function of the evolutionary algorithm must be defined by an expert for each particular behavior.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, in order to evaluate the performance of a controller with a numerical value a general quality measure was defined. It is based on the error measure defined in [15], but including the number of blockades: (18) where d wall is the reference distance to the wall (50 cm) and v max is the maximum value of the velocity (50 cm/s). The higher the quality, the better the controller.…”
Section: Comparison and Statistical Significancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This case study is focused on the development of the wallfollowing robot as explained in 48 . Wall-following behavior is well known in mobile robotics.…”
Section: A Case Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the wall-following robot controller, we used 'minimum' connection method (AND : MIN), minimum activation method (ACT : MIN), and maximum accumulation method (ACCU : MAX). We implemented the RB generated in 48 by the algorithm WCOR 49 . Each entry in the RB was converted to a single FCL rule.…”
Section: Robot Fuzzy Control Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%