2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2015.02.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A case report of two different skull base pathologies causing hearing loss in the same ear: vestibular schwannoma and superior semicircular canal dehiscence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…T his case was unique because there were multiple confirmed otologic findings-bilateral SSCD, right-sided VS, and right-sided BPPV. To the authors' knowledge, combined SSCD and VS has only been described in the literature once, and in that case, the SSCD was unilateral on the same side as the VS (Aaron et al, 2015). That case apparently did not use vestibular testing to aid in the diagnosis, and the treatment options were quite different from our patient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…T his case was unique because there were multiple confirmed otologic findings-bilateral SSCD, right-sided VS, and right-sided BPPV. To the authors' knowledge, combined SSCD and VS has only been described in the literature once, and in that case, the SSCD was unilateral on the same side as the VS (Aaron et al, 2015). That case apparently did not use vestibular testing to aid in the diagnosis, and the treatment options were quite different from our patient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…To our knowledge, both combined pathologies have only been described in the literature twice. Aaron et al (32) first described a patient exhibiting loud sounds/pressure-induced vertigo and left-sided low-frequency mixed-HL, which led authors to ask for an MRI that allowed the detection of an ICVS and a possible concomitant SCD. Nevertheless, neither HRCT nor a complete audiovestibular evaluation were considered.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%