A Case Report of Intensive Exposure-Based Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for an Adolescent With Paraphilia

Merricks, Katie; Nadeau, Joshua M.; Ramos, Anna; Storch, Eric A.

doi:10.1080/0092623x.2016.1178676

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Among 34 studies, there were 28 numbers of unique PROMs identified. Thirteen measures were unique generic profile PROMs, among the most common were KIDSCREEN [ 29 , 43 , 44 , 48 , 51 ], Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) [ 21 , 38 , 40 , 42 , 49 ], KINDL-R [ 45 – 47 ], [ 58 , 59 ], Pediatric Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction (PQ-LES-Q) [ 30 , 54 – 56 ], and the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQl) 4.0 [ 33 , 34 , 41 ]. There were two generic preference-based PROMs, the Euroqol (EQ-5D 3L and 5L), Health Utilities Index (HUI2/3) and thirteen measures were disease-specific, most of which were used in depression such as beck depression inventory (BDI) and child depression inventory (CDI) (Additional file 2 : S2).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Patient-reported outcome measures used to improve youth mental health services: a systematic review

Bajgain

Amarbayan

Wittevrongel

et al. 2023

J Patient Rep Outcomes

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are standardized and validated self-administered questionnaires that assess whether healthcare interventions and practices improve patients’ health and quality of life. PROMs are commonly implemented in children and youth mental health services, as they increasingly emphasize patient-centered care. The objective of this study was to identify and describe the PROMs that are currently in use with children and youth living with mental health conditions (MHCs). Methods Three databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PsycINFO) were systematically searched that used PROMs with children and youth < 18 years of age living with at least one diagnosed MHC. All methods were noted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis. Four independent reviewers extracted data, which included study characteristics (country, year), setting, the type of MHC under investigation, how the PROMs were used, type of respondent, number of items, domain descriptors, and the psychometric properties. Results Of the 5004 articles returned by the electronic search, 34 full-texts were included in this review. This review identified both generic and disease-specific PROMs, and of the 28 measures identified, 13 were generic, two were generic preference-based, and 13 were disease-specific. Conclusion This review shows there is a diverse array of PROMs used in children and youth living with MHCs. Integrating PROMs into the routine clinical care of youth living with MHCs could improve the mental health of youth. Further research on how relevant these PROMs are children and youth with mental health conditions will help establish more uniformity in the use of PROMs for this population.

show abstract