2012
DOI: 10.1007/s13730-012-0007-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A case of renal hypouricemia and a G774A gene mutation causing acute renal injury that was improved by hemodialysis

Abstract: A 16-year-old man came to our hospital complaining of loin pain after a middle-distance race. Following admission, his renal dysfunction worsened rapidly, requiring several hemodialysis sessions. A renal biopsy showed no change in the glomeruli, although interstitial edema was observed. Following the recovery of renal function, we confirmed that his uric acid level was abnormally low and urate clearance was abnormality high. Gene analysis showed that he had a G774A mutation which dominated the SLC22A12 gene en… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
(24 reference statements)
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of note, uric acid in the acute phase of AKI is the norm in the majority of patients, likely due to the rise in muscle release and the decline in kidney function [ 7 ]. The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and uric acid frequently show an opposite trend during the disease course, with eGFR increasing over time while uric acid, in the normal range at onset, becomes undetectable [ 8 , 9 ], as can be observed in our patient (Fig. 2 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Of note, uric acid in the acute phase of AKI is the norm in the majority of patients, likely due to the rise in muscle release and the decline in kidney function [ 7 ]. The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and uric acid frequently show an opposite trend during the disease course, with eGFR increasing over time while uric acid, in the normal range at onset, becomes undetectable [ 8 , 9 ], as can be observed in our patient (Fig. 2 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%