Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2021
DOI: 10.1007/s13691-021-00485-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A case of raised CA 19–9 in a patient with desmoplastic fibroblastoma of the upper limb

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Herein, we report six cases of patients with AIP, causing the elevation of CA 19-9 ranging from 1950 U/mL to 12,000 U/mL, and a case of a patient with liver steatosis and an increased CA 19-9 value to 1930 U/mL. When considering differential diagnosis due to the low specificity of tumor markers and lack of obvious radiological image, various diseases should be taken into consideration [ 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 68 , 69 ]; however, a mildly increased dimension of the pancreas in MRI with areas of fluid signals could correspond to past AIP that induced increased CA 19-9. According to the literature, about 25% of patients with AIP show values of CA 19-9 > 37 U/mL, and only around 12.2% of them show elevated levels > 100 U/mL [ 70 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Herein, we report six cases of patients with AIP, causing the elevation of CA 19-9 ranging from 1950 U/mL to 12,000 U/mL, and a case of a patient with liver steatosis and an increased CA 19-9 value to 1930 U/mL. When considering differential diagnosis due to the low specificity of tumor markers and lack of obvious radiological image, various diseases should be taken into consideration [ 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 68 , 69 ]; however, a mildly increased dimension of the pancreas in MRI with areas of fluid signals could correspond to past AIP that induced increased CA 19-9. According to the literature, about 25% of patients with AIP show values of CA 19-9 > 37 U/mL, and only around 12.2% of them show elevated levels > 100 U/mL [ 70 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, the only approved serum marker for PC diagnosis is carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) in the United States, even though it has low specificity[ 3 ]. However, CA 19-9 is a non-PC-specific marker, shown to increase in colorectal, liver, lung, and ovarian cancers, as well as desmoplastic fibroblastoma[ 4 , 5 ]. Because of the low specificity of CA 19-9, a multi-marker panel that combines some of the currently investigated biomarkers (with CA 19-9) can be used to improve the specificity and sensitivity of PC diagnosis.…”
Section: To the Editormentioning
confidence: 99%