2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jdcr.2020.07.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A case of facial composite tissue allograft rejection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…27 Additionally, there are reports in the literature about subclinical rejection where the allograft shows minimal to no signs of erythema. 5,28,29 In our experience, erythema and exanthema are reliably associated with AR beyond the first two years post-transplant, but subclinical rejections are more frequent thereafter. 7 Using the software to assess clinical perception of rejection comparing facial allograft to native skin suggests erythema is a reliable marker of rejection within the first two years posttransplant, validating prior results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…27 Additionally, there are reports in the literature about subclinical rejection where the allograft shows minimal to no signs of erythema. 5,28,29 In our experience, erythema and exanthema are reliably associated with AR beyond the first two years post-transplant, but subclinical rejections are more frequent thereafter. 7 Using the software to assess clinical perception of rejection comparing facial allograft to native skin suggests erythema is a reliable marker of rejection within the first two years posttransplant, validating prior results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…These include dermal sclerosis encasing the dermal capillaries, sweat gland atrophy, lichenoid changes. [16][17][18] and capillary thrombosis in the upper dermis, with a dense perivascular infiltrate 19 which are thought to be signs of chronic rejection. Etra et al proposed a VCA skin rejection classification in swine which they called the "modified Banff criteria."…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include dermal sclerosis encasing the dermal capillaries, sweat gland atrophy, lichenoid changes. 16–18 and capillary thrombosis in the upper dermis, with a dense perivascular infiltrate 19 which are thought to be signs of chronic rejection. Etra et al proposed a VCA skin rejection classification in swine which they called the “modified Banff criteria.” 20 This focused only on infiltrating inflammatory cells leading to dermal inflammation and largely epidermal involvement focusing on inflammation followed by necrosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%