A case of autoimmune progesterone dermatitis characterized by grouped small vesicles

Hacınecipoğlu, Fatmanur; Benar, Hasan; Gönül, Müzeyyen; Heper, Aylın Okçu

doi:10.1111/ced.12840

Cited by 6 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The most common symptoms of AIPD include urticaria (n = 50), pruritus (n = 27), angioedema (n = 21), and erythema multiforme (n = 19). Symptoms of AIPD begin 3 to 10 days prior to and resolve 1 to 2 days after menses (Anderson, 1984, Asai et al, 2009, Bandino et al, 2011, Baptist and Baldwin, 2004, Berger, 1969, Bernstein et al, 2011, Bolaji and O'Dwyer, 1992, Camoes et al, 2017, Chawla et al, 2009, Choi et al, 2009, Cocuroccia et al, 2006, Cristaudo et al, 2007, Dedecker et al, 2005, Detrixhe et al, 2017, Domeyer-Klenske et al, 2015, Drayer et al, 2018, Farah and Shbaklu, 1971, Foer et al, 2016, Fournier, 2015, Frieder and Younus, 2016, Garcia-Ortega and Scorza, 2011, George and Badawy, 2012, Georgouras, 1981, Grunnet et al, 2017, Hacinecipoglu et al, 2016, Halevy et al, 2002, Hart, 1977, Herzberg et al, 1995, Hill and Carr, 2013, Honda et al, 2014, Izu et al, 2001, Jenkins et al, 2008, Jones and Gordon, 1969, Kakarla and Zurawin, 2006, Katayama and Nishioka, 1985, Kaygusuz et al, 2014, Lahmam Bennani et al, 2012, Le and Wood, 2011, Lee et al, 1992, Lee et al, 2011, Mbonile, 2016, Medeiros et al, 2010, Moghadam et al, 1998, Mokhtari et al, 2017, Moody and Schatten, 1997, Nasabzadeh et al, 2010, Nemeth et al, 2009, Oskay et al, 2002, Ozmen and Akturk, 2016, Poffet et al, 2011, Prieto-Garcia et al, 2011, Rasi and Khatami, 2004, Rodenas et al, 1998, Salman and Ergun, 2017, Shahar et al, 1997, Snyder and Krishnaswamy, 2003, Stephens et al, 1989, Stone and Downham, 1981, Teelucksingh and Edwards, 1990, Toms-Whittle et al, 2011, Tromovitch and Heggli, 1967, Vasconcelos et al, 2000, Walling and Scupham, 2008, …”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Catamenial dermatoses associated with autoimmune, inflammatory, and systemic diseases: A systematic review,,

Zachary

Fackler

Juhász

et al. 2019

International Journal of Women's Dermatology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundSex hormones are important in female sexual physiology, growth, and homeostasis. Through skin receptors, sex hormones contribute to the dermatologic pathology known as catamenial dermatoses.ObjectiveThis study aims to summarize the literature on catamenial dermatoses and menses-induced exacerbations of chronic dermatoses.MethodsThis systematic review used the PRISMA method. PubMed was searched using the terms “menses” and “skin” in July 2018, and an assessment was conducted of the relevant literature on skin diseases related to non-pathologic menstruation, such as polycystic ovarian syndrome. Pathology associated with androgenetic acne was excluded from the study.ResultsA total of 102 studies with 1269 female patients were included. The most commonly reported primary catamenial dermatoses were autoimmune progesterone dermatitis and autoimmune estrogen dermatitis. The most commonly reported chronic skin disorders exacerbated by menses were psoriasis, Behcet’s disease, and eczematous dermatoses.ConclusionPhysicians should be aware of the nature of catamenial dermatoses and their presentation with normal sexual physiology. Patients with chronic dermatoses should be appropriately counseled on menstruation-related exacerbations. Further research needs to be conducted to determine the interplay between immune regulation and sex hormones in catamenial dermatoses and to elucidate effective therapies.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Catamenial dermatoses associated with autoimmune, inflammatory, and systemic diseases: A systematic review,,

Zachary

Fackler

Juhász

et al. 2019

International Journal of Women's Dermatology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…A non‐specific or interstitial inflammatory infiltrate was described in 31% of the cases, with 41% having an eosinophilic component and 21% having a neutrophilic component mixed with the predominant lymphocytic infiltrate. There were a few rare cases where the predominant cell type was eosinophils or neutrophils . There was rare mention of mast cells and multinucleate giant cells but these were only reported in one case each.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The histopathologic features of autoimmune progesterone dermatitis

2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background:The histologic features of autoimmune progesterone dermatitis (APD) are generally non-specific and have been described only in brief case reports. We present a case of APD and review the literature with a focus on the histologic findings described. Methods: A review of the English literature on APD was performed using PubMed and MEDLINE. Results: A total of 39 patients, including our patient are included in this review. The most consistent histologic finding reported was a perivascular inflammatory infiltrate, being seen in 72% of cases. A non-specific or interstitial inflammatory infiltrate was described in 31% of the cases, with 41% having an eosinophilic component and 21% having a neutrophilic component mixed with the predominant lymphocytic infiltrate. Interface dermatitis was the second most common finding with 36% showing a mild to exaggerated interface dermatitis. Conclusion: Although histopathologic changes are non-specific, perivascular dermatitis with eosinophils and interface changes are common in APD.Keywords: autoimmune progesterone dermatitis, histopathology of autoimmune progesterone dermatitis, progesterone allergy, progesterone anaphylaxis James T, Ghaferi J, LaFond A. The histopathologic features of autoimmune progesterone dermatitis.

show abstract

“…One hundred twelve articles were found to include a case report meeting our inclusion criteria 3–114 . Within these articles, 132 unique cases of AIPD were identified.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Autoimmune Progesterone Dermatitis: A Systematic Review

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Autoimmune progesterone dermatitis (AIPD) is a cyclical, cutaneous reaction to endogenous progesterone that occurs throughout the menstrual cycle. The cutaneous manifestations of AIPD vary greatly from patient to patient, ranging anywhere from urticaria to erythema multiforme to anaphylaxis. As such, recognition, diagnosis, and management of this condition are difficult for clinicians. In the present article, we conducted a systematic review of 112 articles and 132 individual cases to summarize the clinical features and presentation of AIPD while also summarizing the successes and failures of different treatment plans. Despite the great variety in clinical presentations, it is clear from the data that ovulation-suppressing medical therapies and surgery have the greatest success in treating AIPD, whereas more commonly used therapies such as antihistamines and systemic corticosteroids frequently fail in providing any relief. Further research is necessary to determine the exact pathogenesis of AIPD and allow for more targeted treatment.

show abstract

A case of autoimmune progesterone dermatitis characterized by grouped small vesicles

Cited by 6 publications

References 4 publications

Catamenial dermatoses associated with autoimmune, inflammatory, and systemic diseases: A systematic review,,

Catamenial dermatoses associated with autoimmune, inflammatory, and systemic diseases: A systematic review,,

The histopathologic features of autoimmune progesterone dermatitis

Autoimmune Progesterone Dermatitis: A Systematic Review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About