Proceedings of the 2008 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data 2008
DOI: 10.1145/1376616.1376723
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A case for flash memory ssd in enterprise database applications

Abstract: Due to its superiority such as low access latency, low energy consumption, light weight, and shock resistance, the success of flash memory as a storage alternative for mobile computing devices has been steadily expanded into personal computer and enterprise server markets with ever increasing capacity of its storage. However, since flash memory exhibits poor performance for small-to-moderate sized writes requested in a random order, existing database systems may not be able to take full advantage of flash memo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
119
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 230 publications
(121 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
119
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main goals of this WPCB-tree are as follows: (1) to quickly create the index structure with very little use of the main memory resource; (2) to alleviate the disadvantage of the random write pattern by converting the write pattern from random to sequential; and (3) to ensure that the data is nonvolatile in the case of sudden power failure. The WPCB-tree avoids the erase-before-write characteristic and reduces the number of write operations by using a novel method and mechanism.…”
Section: Wpcb-tree: a B-tree Using A Write Pattern Convertermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The main goals of this WPCB-tree are as follows: (1) to quickly create the index structure with very little use of the main memory resource; (2) to alleviate the disadvantage of the random write pattern by converting the write pattern from random to sequential; and (3) to ensure that the data is nonvolatile in the case of sudden power failure. The WPCB-tree avoids the erase-before-write characteristic and reduces the number of write operations by using a novel method and mechanism.…”
Section: Wpcb-tree: a B-tree Using A Write Pattern Convertermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although these advantages have lead flash memory to become a commonly used memory technology, its downsides, including erase-before-write, limited life cycle, and higher cost than a normal HDD, should not be overlooked [1][2][3][4][5]. Among these mentioned weak points, erase-before-write is a critical characteristic that needs to be mitigated because an erase operation leads to many read and write operations and shortens the life cycle of flash memory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Changes in the hardware can also improve performance, since applications like large databases are usually IO intensive. Solid-state Drives(SSD) in general have a better performance then Hard Disk Drivers(HDDs) for this scenario (Lee et al 2008) …”
Section: Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Block-level buffer management policy not only invokes relatively fewer merge operations than page-level buffer management policy but also invokes switch merge or partial merge rather than full merge for merge operation. Block-level buffer management policy shows better overall performance than the page-level buffer management policy [12], [16]- [18].…”
Section: Flash Buffer Cachementioning
confidence: 99%