2015
DOI: 10.1002/jcph.676
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Case-Based Approach to Integrating Opioid Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Concepts in Cancer Pain Management

Abstract: Opioids are prescribed for cancer pain. Over the past decade, the annual increase in opioid prescriptions has been accompanied by an increase in opioid-associated deaths. Health care professionals must be proficient in proper dosing, titrating, and monitoring of opioid medications. With the numerous opioid medications and formulations available, an understanding of pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) concepts is necessary to appropriately individualize opioid-based cancer pain regimens. The purpose o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
(207 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pharmacodynamic effects include not only the primary desired outcome of analgesia but adverse effects of sedation, euphoria, dysphoria, nausea, vomiting, hypotension, gastrointestinal hypomotility (ie, constipation), QTc prolongation (eg, methadone), respiratory depression, pruritus, and urinary retention, among others . Often, the prescriber must titrate the dose to balance the desired pharmacodynamic response of pain control with undesirable side effects.…”
Section: Basics Of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Pharmacodynamic effects include not only the primary desired outcome of analgesia but adverse effects of sedation, euphoria, dysphoria, nausea, vomiting, hypotension, gastrointestinal hypomotility (ie, constipation), QTc prolongation (eg, methadone), respiratory depression, pruritus, and urinary retention, among others . Often, the prescriber must titrate the dose to balance the desired pharmacodynamic response of pain control with undesirable side effects.…”
Section: Basics Of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pharmacodynamic effects include not only the primary desired outcome of analgesia but adverse effects of sedation, euphoria, dysphoria, nausea, vomiting, hypotension, gastrointestinal hypomotility (ie, constipation), QTc prolongation (eg, methadone), respiratory depression, pruritus, and urinary retention, among others. 16 Often, the prescriber must titrate the dose to balance the desired pharmacodynamic response of pain control with undesirable side effects. The mixed agonistantagonist opioids (eg, butorphanol) have "ceiling effects" on analgesia (higher doses do not result in greater analgesia), whereas buprenorphine has a "ceiling effect" on respiratory depression that makes it safer for use in opioid use disorder.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Opioids activate the endogenous pain-modulating system of opioid peptides (e.g., enkephalins, endorphins, and dynorphins) and spinal cord and brain receptors (μ, kappa [κ], and delta [δ]) to alter pain perception (Branford, Droney, & Ross, 2012;Lam, Pirrello, & Ma, 2016;Pasternak, 2014). The μ agonists also indirectly modify descending spinal cord inhibitory pathways (Pathan & Williams, 2012).…”
Section: Opioid Metabolism and Pharmacologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…po = oral; IR = immediate release; SR = sustained release; ER = extended release; SNRI = serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor; TCA = tricyclic antidepressant; MAOI = monoamine oxidase inhibitor; conc = concentrate; IV = intravenous; SC = subcutaneous; M3G = morphine-3-glucuronide; H3G = hydromorphone-3-glucuronide, hERG = human ether-a-go-go-related gene; QTc = corrected QT; pr = rectal; NMDA = N-methyl-Daspartate; TD = transdermal; TM = transmucosal; IM = intramuscular. Information from Andresen et al (2010); Branford et al (2012); Davis & Walsh (2001);DePriest et al (2015); Enggaard et al (2006); Gudin (2012); Kalso (2005); Lam et al (2016); Mercadante (2015); Portenoy & Ahmed (2014); Prommer (2015); Smith (2011).…”
Section: Wickham Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%