2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhg.2012.02.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A cartographic fade to black: mapping the destruction of urban Japan during World War II

Abstract: In this paper we examine the history, production, and use e practical and rhetorical e of maps created by the United States government during World War II as related to the development and execution of aerial bombing policies against Japan. Drawing from a range of maps and primary documents culled from libraries and archives in the United States, we argue that maps provide an important, and hitherto neglected, means through which to trace the exploration and eventual embrace of the incendiary bombing of Japan'… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…But the shattering of Hiroshima and Nagasaki added a horrifically vivid and specific materiality to the ‘imagination of disaster’. While dozens of other Japanese cities were intentionally demolished by US Army Air Forces incendiary weapons – ‘an embrace of urbicide as a legitimate form of warfare’ (Fedman and Karacas, 2012: 313), or what Hewitt (1983) called ‘place annihilation’ – and while some US war-planners saw a nuclear weapon as merely one more item at the military’s disposal, it is also undeniable that Hiroshima and Nagasaki were and continue to be treated differently (see Dower, 2010). The two cities became a single template for further exercises in (imagined) mass annihilation.…”
Section: Military Spectacles and The Emergence Of Nuclear Statesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But the shattering of Hiroshima and Nagasaki added a horrifically vivid and specific materiality to the ‘imagination of disaster’. While dozens of other Japanese cities were intentionally demolished by US Army Air Forces incendiary weapons – ‘an embrace of urbicide as a legitimate form of warfare’ (Fedman and Karacas, 2012: 313), or what Hewitt (1983) called ‘place annihilation’ – and while some US war-planners saw a nuclear weapon as merely one more item at the military’s disposal, it is also undeniable that Hiroshima and Nagasaki were and continue to be treated differently (see Dower, 2010). The two cities became a single template for further exercises in (imagined) mass annihilation.…”
Section: Military Spectacles and The Emergence Of Nuclear Statesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such preparations, however, were of relatively little use in front of the colossal bombing capacity deployed by Allied planes (Taylor ; US Department of Defense ). In the case of Japanese cities, the careful mapping preparation of the bombing took into account the infrastructures of water and energy supply (Fedman and Karacas ). The water storage capacity of Japanese cities was low and its water supply systems were considered weak and highly dependent on electrical pumping systems.…”
Section: War Water and Cities: A Brief Accountmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There were certainly excellent scholars who have contributed to Japanese (post)colonial geographies (Fedman & Karacas, 2012; Howell, 2005; Kinda, 1997; Takeuchi, 2000; Walker, 2007), but compared to the more extensive and detailed English‐language western colonial studies, the study of Japanese colonial geographies is found wanting. Existing publications on Japanese colonialism are either historical or sociological studies, with only a few appearing in geography journals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%