2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2010.12.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Cartesian grid embedded boundary method for solving the Poisson and heat equations with discontinuous coefficients in three dimensions

Abstract: We present a method for solving Poisson and heat equations with discontinuous coefficients in two-and three-dimensions. It uses a Cartesian cutcell/embedded boundary method to represent the interface between materials, as described in Johansen & Colella (1998). Matching conditions across the interface are enforced using an approximation to fluxes at the boundary.Overall second order accuracy is achieved, as indicated by an array of tests using non-trivial interface geometries. Both the elliptic and heat solver… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
61
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(31 reference statements)
1
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…the solution itself is given at the boundary. The case of imposing Neumann or Robin or jump boundary conditions is not the focus of this paper and we refer the interested reader to [32,63,11,146,75,77,104,78,114,55,50,150,83] and the references therein. Finally, typical scientific applications exhibit solutions with different length scales.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…the solution itself is given at the boundary. The case of imposing Neumann or Robin or jump boundary conditions is not the focus of this paper and we refer the interested reader to [32,63,11,146,75,77,104,78,114,55,50,150,83] and the references therein. Finally, typical scientific applications exhibit solutions with different length scales.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[110,81,80] and the references therein. We note that block structured AMR solvers, aided by efficient multigrid solvers (see [32] and the references therein), have advantages in that the entire grid structure may be stored efficiently, which may speed up the execution time. However, they do not have the flexibility of Octrees and require more grid points and therefore computational time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that the surface is tracked by a level-set without particles in this experiment, and that the blue color indicates fluid cells, rather than depicting the actual fluid domain. separated fluid component, similar to [44], [45], [46], [47]. Conceptually, we build a distinct coarse grid for each separated fluid component, with the coarse grids being allowed to overlap.…”
Section: Multigrid Solvermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the one-sided quadratic interpolations used to compute the fluxes along the boundary yield an asymmetric system. See [82,83] for a more recent 3-dimensional version applied to Poisson's equation and the heat equation. In [84], Oevermann and Klein proposed a second order finite volume method for interface problems, and simplified and extended their method to 3-dimensions in [85].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, less general multigrid algorithms specially tuned to the particular discretization method may outperform a black-box multigrid solver; see, for example, [28,86]. Some methods lend themselves to using relatively straightforward extensions of standard geometric multigrid techniques, including both mortar finite element methods [7,9] and embedded methods [48,[81][82][83], usually with special attention being paid near irregular features. Many of the works describing IIM-based discretizations [26][27][28]22] utilize a multigrid solver with a grid hierarchy defined geometrically but incorporate algebraic techniques in the remaining components (coarse-grid operators and grid transfer operators).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%