2013
DOI: 10.1089/thy.2011.0415
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Carcinoma Showing Thymus-Like Elements of the Thyroid Arising in Close Association with Solid Cell Nests: Evidence for a Precursor Lesion?

Abstract: The inclusion of CASTLE in the differential diagnosis of poorly differentiated tumors of the thyroid region and the use of ancillary studies are essential to diagnose this rare entity associated with a relatively favorable prognosis. The close association of CASTLE with SC-nests opens the way to a new scenario for studies of its histogenesis.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is also difficult to cytologically make a correct diagnosis of this disease. For all the cases of intrathyroidal thymic carcinoma we could search in PubMed, as shown in Table , the cytological diagnosis rate of this disease was only 5.3% (3/57), and one case was diagnosed based on a history of metastatic CASTLE in the pleura. A total of 77.2% (44/57) of intrathyroidal thymic carcinoma cases were given a correct qualitative diagnosis but without further definite subclassification, including “poorly differentiated carcinoma” (19.3%, 11/57), “carcinoma” (40.4%, 23/57), and “malignant tumor” (17.5%, 10/57); 14.04% (8/57) were given a wrong subclassification, including “undifferentiated carcinoma” (5.3%, 3/57), “papillary thyroid carcinoma” (7.0%, 4/57), and “Hürthle cell neoplasm” (1.8%, 1/57); one case (1.8%) was diagnosed as atypia of undetermined significance (AUS), and one case (1.8%) was diagnosed as an indeterminate nodule in which only necrotic material was aspirated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also difficult to cytologically make a correct diagnosis of this disease. For all the cases of intrathyroidal thymic carcinoma we could search in PubMed, as shown in Table , the cytological diagnosis rate of this disease was only 5.3% (3/57), and one case was diagnosed based on a history of metastatic CASTLE in the pleura. A total of 77.2% (44/57) of intrathyroidal thymic carcinoma cases were given a correct qualitative diagnosis but without further definite subclassification, including “poorly differentiated carcinoma” (19.3%, 11/57), “carcinoma” (40.4%, 23/57), and “malignant tumor” (17.5%, 10/57); 14.04% (8/57) were given a wrong subclassification, including “undifferentiated carcinoma” (5.3%, 3/57), “papillary thyroid carcinoma” (7.0%, 4/57), and “Hürthle cell neoplasm” (1.8%, 1/57); one case (1.8%) was diagnosed as atypia of undetermined significance (AUS), and one case (1.8%) was diagnosed as an indeterminate nodule in which only necrotic material was aspirated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4a) [2,3]. The histological features are correlative with the proposed histogenesis of this neoplasm arising from either an embryologic thymic tissue rest or remnants from the thymopharyngeal duct or branchial pouches, including the ultimobranchial body [2,17,18]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…By contrast, reports of ectopic thymic carcinoma are very limited in view of its rarity, except for carcinoma showing thymus-like elements of the thyroid, so called CASTLE, whose pathogenesis is suspected to be a remnant of the branchial pouch from which the thyroid gland originates, and is thus not ectopic thymus tissue [2][3][4][5][6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%