A carbon horse race: abatement subsidies vs. permit trading in Switzerland

Hintermann, Beat; Zarkovic, Maja

doi:10.1080/14693062.2020.1846485

Cited by 6 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 20 publications

(10 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…closure policies, in company with other market-based regulatory approach to reducing carbon emissions. Other examples include the cap and trade system of the EU Emissions Trading System (EUTS), and carbon taxation schemes (Hintermann and Zarkovic, 2020;Asen, 2021). 8 2 Institutional Background and Data 2.1 Energy Performance Certificates and the EPBR 2011 Amendment Energy Performance Certificates were introduced in the UK on 1 August, 2007 by the Housing Act 2004 andEPBR 2007.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Do Homebuyers Value Energy Efficiency? Evidence From an Information Shock

2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Do Homebuyers Value Energy Efficiency? Evidence From an Information Shock

2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…In order to control carbon emissions and maintain sustainable economic development, governments have started to implement low-carbon policies. The more commonly used policies currently include the introduction of carbon taxes [4], the implementation of carbon trading systems [5] and low-carbon subsidy policies [6]. Among them, a carbon trading policy, as an effective measure used to control carbon emissions, on the one hand, raises the cost of reducing emissions for enterprises and controls carbon emissions at source [7].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Supply Chain Emission Reduction Decisions, Considering Overconfidence under Conditions of Carbon Trading Price Volatility

Sun

2022

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

To investigate the effects of carbon trading pricing and overconfidence on supply chain emission reduction decisions, this paper establishes a supply chain model consisting of a manufacturer and a retailer and applies the Stackelberg game model. The objective is to explore the effects of carbon trading pricing and overconfidence on supply chain members’ decisions and profits. The study shows that carbon trading prices can be a good guide for low-cost manufacturers to reduce emissions when manufacturers are rational under carbon trading policies. However, the ability of carbon trading prices to act as a guide starts to fail as the cost of emission reduction increases. When manufacturers are overconfident, this causes manufacturers to increase the emission reduction rate of their products under carbon trading policies. In addition, this effect increases in line with increases in carbon trading prices. When manufacturers face different emission reduction costs, higher carbon trading prices do not necessarily always generate benefits for rational manufacturers. For overconfident manufacturers, however, overconfidence is always detrimental, especially when the price of carbon trading increases. Retailers tend to choose to work with manufacturers who are less overconfident, when the higher price of carbon trading results in higher gains for the retailer.

show abstract

A Comparative Analysis of South Africa’s Carbon Pricing Policy in the Power and Energy-Intensive Industries

Makamela,

Ramfol

2024

Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A carbon horse race: abatement subsidies vs. permit trading in Switzerland

Cited by 6 publications

References 20 publications

Do Homebuyers Value Energy Efficiency? Evidence From an Information Shock

Do Homebuyers Value Energy Efficiency? Evidence From an Information Shock

Supply Chain Emission Reduction Decisions, Considering Overconfidence under Conditions of Carbon Trading Price Volatility

A Comparative Analysis of South Africa’s Carbon Pricing Policy in the Power and Energy-Intensive Industries

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About