1989
DOI: 10.1162/neco.1989.1.4.480
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Canonical Microcircuit for Neocortex

Abstract: We have used microanatomy derived from single neurons, and in vivo intracellular recordings to develop a simplified circuit of the visual cortex. The circuit explains the intracellular responses to pulse stimulation in terms of the interactions between three basic populations of neurons, and reveals the following features of cortical processing that are important to computational theories of neocortex. First, inhibition and excitation are not separable events. Activation of the cortex inevitably sets in motion… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
335
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 454 publications
(347 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
11
335
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These have been most extensively studied in area V1. One set of connections comprises the connections that form the intracolumnar canonical microcircuit (see Douglas, Martin, & Whitteridge, 1989;Douglas & Martin, 1990;, connecting cells in layer IV, which receive inputs from lower layers in the hierarchy, with cells in other layers (these are sometimes called vertical connections). The other set is intercolumnar, connecting cells in layers II/III (see Gilbert, 1993;Levitt, Lund, & Yoshioka, 1996;Fitzpatrick, 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These have been most extensively studied in area V1. One set of connections comprises the connections that form the intracolumnar canonical microcircuit (see Douglas, Martin, & Whitteridge, 1989;Douglas & Martin, 1990;, connecting cells in layer IV, which receive inputs from lower layers in the hierarchy, with cells in other layers (these are sometimes called vertical connections). The other set is intercolumnar, connecting cells in layers II/III (see Gilbert, 1993;Levitt, Lund, & Yoshioka, 1996;Fitzpatrick, 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model we use to simulate the dynamics of a column is motivated by anatomical and physiological properties of the cortex on the scale of a few hundred microns. In particular, it reflects the columnar organization of the cortex (see, e.g., Mountcastle 1997) and the concept of canonical cortical microcircuits as suggested, e.g., by Douglas et al (1989). Columns are physiologically defined groups of neurons that extend through all cortical layers and have a diameter of roughly one mm.…”
Section: Neurobiological Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…However, local cortical circuits include dense recurrent connections among spiny stellate cells (Douglas et al 1989Stratford et al 1996). Such connections provide a signi®cant source of recurrent excitation and have been suggested to be very eective in generating cortical direction selectivity .…”
Section: Eects Of Additional Recurrent Excitationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Orientation speci®city and direction selectivity of simple cells have been revealed as emergent properties of massive excitatory and inhibitory interactions [cf. canonical cortical microcircuit (Douglas et al 1989)]. Due to the computational complexity (high-dimension) of the system of coupled nonlinear partial dierential equations at stake, analytical predictions of the network's behavior have only rarely been attempted, under heavy simplifying assumptions, and always restricted to basic functioning mechanisms of cortical microcircuits Orban 1992, 1996;Suarez et al 1995).…”
Section: Comparison To Other Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%