Lecture Notes in Control and Information Science
DOI: 10.1007/11612735_13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Canonical Form for the Design of Unknown Input Sliding Mode Observers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
52
0

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it is necessary that the system's unknown inputs and outputs satisfy the so-called matching condition [6]. To overcome this limitation, system coordinates transformation are introduced and the use of sliding mode differentiator (SMD) for the auxiliary output generation is generalized [7], [8]. This allows to use a powerful optimization technique, like linear matrix inequality (LMI), to offer a systematic design procedure of the observer gain [9].…”
Section: Lfridman@servidorunammxmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is necessary that the system's unknown inputs and outputs satisfy the so-called matching condition [6]. To overcome this limitation, system coordinates transformation are introduced and the use of sliding mode differentiator (SMD) for the auxiliary output generation is generalized [7], [8]. This allows to use a powerful optimization technique, like linear matrix inequality (LMI), to offer a systematic design procedure of the observer gain [9].…”
Section: Lfridman@servidorunammxmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[25]; it is also used in Lyapunov-based designs as in e.g., [27] and [16] or in order to decompose the system, as in [30] and [12]. A notable exception (for linear systems) is [14] where the authors propose a method to transform the system into a new canonical form; however, even though the authors of [14] succeed in avoiding the relative degree one assumption, it is assumed that measurements are noise-free i.e., y = C 0 x * . This work was extended in [6] to the case of nonlinear systems, yet locally transformed into a specific triangular observable form, for which a higher order sliding mode observer was introduced.…”
Section: Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method has been successfully used in the design of high-order sliding mode estimators; in this case, one may establish finite-time estimation and unknown input reconstruction recursively (step by step). See for instance [6,14] as well as the works on high-order differentiators by [20,21]. The main and clear disadvantage of this method is that it relies on coordinate transformations which are valid locally.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be shown (see [18] and [28]) that with a suitable choice of gains λ s and α s , a sliding mode appears in finite time on the manifoldξ 1 = · · · =ξ l = 0, and that the following equivalent output injection is obtained:…”
Section: A Sliding Mode Observer For a Triangular Observable Formmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the method given in this paper enables estimation of the unknown inputs. Define (v c ) eq as the equivalent output error injection required to maintain the sliding motion in (18). During the sliding motion, one can write thatṡ…”
Section: First/second Order Sliding Mode Unknown Input Observermentioning
confidence: 99%