To compare clinical outcomes and tunnel widening following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) performed with an all-inside technique (Group A) or with a bioabsorbable tibial screw and suspensory femoral fixation (Group B). Methods: Tunnel widening was assessed using computed tomography (CT) and a previously validated analytical best fit cylinder technique at approximately one-year following ACLR. Clinical follow up comprised evaluation with IKDC, KSS, Tegner, Lysholm scores, and knee-laxity assessment. Results: The study population comprised twenty-two patients in each group with a median clinical follow up of 24 months (range 21 to 27 months). The median duration between ACLR and CT was 13 months (range 12 to 14 months). There were no significant differences in clinical outcome measures between groups. There were no differences between groups with respect to femoral tunnel widening. However, there was a significantly larger increase in tibial tunnel widening, at the middle portion, in Group B (2.4 ± 1.5mm) compared to Group A (0.8 ± 0.4mm) (p=0.027), and also at the articular portion in Group B (1.5 ± 0.8mm) compared to Group A (0.8 ± 0.8mm) (p=0.027). Conclusion: Tibial tunnel widening after ACLR using hamstring tendon autograft is significantly greater with suspensory femoral fixation and a bioabsorbable tibial interference screw when compared to an all-inside technique at a median follow up of two years. The clinical relevance of this work lies in the rebuttal of concerns arising from biomechanical studies regarding the possibility of increased tunnel widening with an all-inside technique.