2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jct.2010.12.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A calorimetric study of carbamate formation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
41
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
6
41
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our values for DH o m and DS o m are À18(1) kJ Á mol À1 and À25(3) J Á K À1 Á mol À1 , respectively. The former is intermediate within the reported data range for DH o m , but lower than the calorimetrically-determined value, while DS o m is also lower than the reported value [20]. Smaller variations in log 10 K 9 and DH o m appear for DEA.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 58%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Our values for DH o m and DS o m are À18(1) kJ Á mol À1 and À25(3) J Á K À1 Á mol À1 , respectively. The former is intermediate within the reported data range for DH o m , but lower than the calorimetrically-determined value, while DS o m is also lower than the reported value [20]. Smaller variations in log 10 K 9 and DH o m appear for DEA.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 58%
“…However, there is a considerable spread in the reported value for DH o m . Values vary from À13(2) to À33(2) kJ Á mol À1 [13,[15][16][17], and a value for DH o m based on isothermal titration calorimetry of À29.7(1) kJ Á mol À1 , with an accompanying value for DS o m of À69.0(7) J Á K À1 Á mol À1 , has been recently reported [20]. Our values for DH o m and DS o m are À18(1) kJ Á mol À1 and À25(3) J Á K À1 Á mol À1 , respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations