2017
DOI: 10.1187/cbe.16-12-0352
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Call to Develop Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experiences (CUREs) for Nonmajors Courses

Abstract: A discussion of course-based undergraduate research experiences (CUREs) for non–science majors (nonmajors) that summarizes the state of knowledge of best practices for nonmajors CUREs, identifies future research priorities, and recommends tools to align research questions with student outcomes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
71
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
71
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this article, we demonstrate that the BM&C course, as implemented, provides students with many of the key positive affective outcomes associated with CUREs, including increased science identity, greater opportunity for advancement in technical skills, and increased research acculturation versus their non-CURE counterparts (Badalà et al, 2013;Hanauer and Hatfull, 2015;Jeffery et al, 2016;Olimpo et al, 2016;Ballen et al, 2017;Frantz et al, 2017). Moreover, these metrics are achieved in a crowd-training environment wherein students can perform highquality research that can be readily disseminated in traditional circles of professional scientific communication (e.g., scientific conferences; peer-reviewed publications).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this article, we demonstrate that the BM&C course, as implemented, provides students with many of the key positive affective outcomes associated with CUREs, including increased science identity, greater opportunity for advancement in technical skills, and increased research acculturation versus their non-CURE counterparts (Badalà et al, 2013;Hanauer and Hatfull, 2015;Jeffery et al, 2016;Olimpo et al, 2016;Ballen et al, 2017;Frantz et al, 2017). Moreover, these metrics are achieved in a crowd-training environment wherein students can perform highquality research that can be readily disseminated in traditional circles of professional scientific communication (e.g., scientific conferences; peer-reviewed publications).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Briefly, through a collaborative and iterative process, CUREs engage students in scientific practices that promote discovery of novel findings that are of broader relevance to the scientific community (Auchincloss et al, 2014). The resulting shifts in course enjoyment, research skills development, autonomy, and retention observed for CURE students versus their non-CURE counterparts have motivated interest in developing CURE curricula across the STEM fields (Badalà et al, 2013;Auchincloss et al, 2014;Jeffery et al, 2016;Olimpo et al, 2016;Rodenbusch et al, 2016;Ballen et al, 2017;Dolan, 2017;Frantz et al, 2017). In neuroscience, while problem-and research-based courses within the subdisciplines of medicine (medical neuroanatomy), psychology, and cell/molecular biology are represented in the literature, a brief review of published curricula indicates a gap in CURE offerings designed for entry-level students (please refer to Supplemental Materials I for a description of such approaches).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Students display higher positive attitudes and lower negative attitudes towards science, both pre-and post-course. Another possible effect of CURE participation is improved student attitudes towards science [13,40]. In the CURE survey, students were asked to rate the degree to which they agree or disagree with various statements that reflect positive or negative attitudes towards science [13,30].…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%
“…1) Authentic problems that are of broad relevance (Ballen et al, 2017) to the scientific community and where the answer is unknown to everyone. 2) Authentic physical environments when working in research laboratories rather than student laboratories 1 .…”
Section: Study Context and Designmentioning
confidence: 99%