2018
DOI: 10.1038/s41592-018-0195-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A call for public archives for biological image data

Abstract: Public data archives are the backbone of modern biological research. Biomolecular archives are well established, but bioimaging resources lag behind them. The technology required for imaging archives is now available, thus enabling the creation of the first public bioimage datasets. We present the rationale for the construction of bioimage archives and their associated databases to underpin the next revolution in bioinformatics discovery.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
107
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(109 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
107
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At least 10 3D dSTORM images were acquired in each imaging medium for both dyes (AF647 and AF(+)647), and for all targets, tubulin β3, NfL and βII spectrin. Raw image data used for dSTORM quantification are available in the BioImage Archive 26,27 (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/bioimage-archive) under accession number S-BIAD16.…”
Section: Scientific Reports |mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At least 10 3D dSTORM images were acquired in each imaging medium for both dyes (AF647 and AF(+)647), and for all targets, tubulin β3, NfL and βII spectrin. Raw image data used for dSTORM quantification are available in the BioImage Archive 26,27 (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/bioimage-archive) under accession number S-BIAD16.…”
Section: Scientific Reports |mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The user selects a workflow (3) to process the images, and sets its parameters (4) before running it. Finally the results can be visualized overlaid on the original images (5), and benchmark metrics are reported as overall statistics for all the images or per image (6).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, this does not only impair the reusability of the methods and impede reproducing published results [5], but it also makes it difficult to adapt these methods to process similar image datasets. To improve this situation, scientific datasets are now increasingly made publicly available through web-based software [6][7] [8] and open data initiatives [9], but existing web platforms do not systematically offer advanced features such as the ability to remotely view multidimensional microscopy images, process the images online by remotely launching image analysis workflows, and compare the results of the methods against a ground-truth reference (a.k.a. benchmarking).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, this effort will be important for imaging modalities for which this standard is not in use now and information is not automatically filled in, or for thirdparty software or home-made methods to compute the spatial transformation that link two images or volumes. For this reason, there is ongoing effort associated with the deployment of public image archive [139][140][141] to define some minimal metadata requirement, and the one associated with CMI have still to be defined by the community.…”
Section: Correlation Softwarementioning
confidence: 99%