Proceedings of 37th International Cosmic Ray Conference — PoS(ICRC2021) 2021
DOI: 10.22323/1.395.1023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A calibration study of local ice and optical sensor properties in IceCube

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Employing the experimental and analysis methods described above, absolute absorption and scattering coefficients and their wavelength scaling have been measured for all instrumented depths as described in detail by Ackermann et al (2006) and Aartsen et al (2013d). The resulting model, called the "South Pole Ice Model" (SPICE), continues to be updated and refined as new aspects of the instrumentation such as the properties of the refrozen drill columns (Chirkin et al, 2021) as well as 260 previously unconsidered features in the ice begin to be modeled. The stratigraphy used as the starting point for this study is shown in Figure 5.…”
Section: The South Pole Ice Model (Spice)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Employing the experimental and analysis methods described above, absolute absorption and scattering coefficients and their wavelength scaling have been measured for all instrumented depths as described in detail by Ackermann et al (2006) and Aartsen et al (2013d). The resulting model, called the "South Pole Ice Model" (SPICE), continues to be updated and refined as new aspects of the instrumentation such as the properties of the refrozen drill columns (Chirkin et al, 2021) as well as 260 previously unconsidered features in the ice begin to be modeled. The stratigraphy used as the starting point for this study is shown in Figure 5.…”
Section: The South Pole Ice Model (Spice)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In both cases a near constant elevation angle of on average 5 • has been fitted. However, this fit is difficult to completely disentangle from effects that may arise as a result of mis-modeling of the layer undulations or the optical properties of the refrozen drill holes (Chirkin et al, 2021). As the resulting improvement in data-simulation agreement was seen to be small, this additional complication is not further considered here.…”
Section: The Anisotropy Axismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation