1986
DOI: 10.1029/jc091ic06p07761
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A calibration diagram of specific beam attenuation

Abstract: A diagram has been developed to demonstrate the response of the beam attenuation coefficient per unit volume (termed the specific beam attenuation coefficient) to changes in particulate size distribution and refractive index. Upon examination, the diagram accurately predicts the optical behavior of particulate samples measured by previous researchers. With estimates of the particle refractive index and size distribution, the diagram provides a higher degree of resolution than was previously assumed in using li… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In lake waters the scattering coefficient is normally much larger than the absorption coefficient, particularly at 660 nm. Consequently, variations in c are largely the result of variations in scattering which, in addition to particle concentration, is dependent on the size, shape, density, and refractive index of the SPM (Gordon et al, 1980;Kitchen et al, 1982;Kirk, 1983;Baker & Lavelle, 1984;Spinrad, 1986). Of these, size is of critical importance in determining the attenuation efficiency of the SPM [e.g.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In lake waters the scattering coefficient is normally much larger than the absorption coefficient, particularly at 660 nm. Consequently, variations in c are largely the result of variations in scattering which, in addition to particle concentration, is dependent on the size, shape, density, and refractive index of the SPM (Gordon et al, 1980;Kitchen et al, 1982;Kirk, 1983;Baker & Lavelle, 1984;Spinrad, 1986). Of these, size is of critical importance in determining the attenuation efficiency of the SPM [e.g.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The slope in this linear relationship depends on the characteristics (size distribution, refractive index, and to a lesser extent shape) of the seston assemblage (see e.g. Baker and Lavelle 1984;Spinrad 1986). This slope changes from place to place, even iF only deep waters are considered (Bishop 1986).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The range of refractive indices for marine particles relative to seawater are 1 .O l-l. 10 (e.g. Carder et al 1972;Gordon and Brown 1972;Zaneveld et al 1974;Spinrad 1986). The relative refractive index of the gelatin mixture (1.036) nearly matched the refractive index of marine particles, minimizing the effects of light scattering.…”
Section: Microphotometric Determinations -mentioning
confidence: 99%