2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2011.09.066
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A business case for Smart Grid technologies: A systemic perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
81
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
81
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, end-users perceive smart meters as potentially compromising their privacy and reducing their level of control over electricity usage (Krishnamurti et al, 2012). Data privacy and security issues associated with the exposure of end-users' information, habits and behaviours extracted from electricity monitoring data are the most cited key challenges in smart metering deployment (Clastres, 2011;Darby and McKenna, 2012;Giordano and Fulli, 2012;Krishnamurti et al, 2012;Martiskainen and Coburn, 2010;McDaniel and McLaughlin, 2009;Olmos et al, 2011;Verbong et al, 2013). Positive willingness to pay for smart meters was found to be associated with trust in the protection of personal smart metering data, intention to change energy behaviours and, less importantly, potential energy savings and environmental awareness (Gerpott and Paukert, 2013).…”
Section: The Role Of People In Smart Gridsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, end-users perceive smart meters as potentially compromising their privacy and reducing their level of control over electricity usage (Krishnamurti et al, 2012). Data privacy and security issues associated with the exposure of end-users' information, habits and behaviours extracted from electricity monitoring data are the most cited key challenges in smart metering deployment (Clastres, 2011;Darby and McKenna, 2012;Giordano and Fulli, 2012;Krishnamurti et al, 2012;Martiskainen and Coburn, 2010;McDaniel and McLaughlin, 2009;Olmos et al, 2011;Verbong et al, 2013). Positive willingness to pay for smart meters was found to be associated with trust in the protection of personal smart metering data, intention to change energy behaviours and, less importantly, potential energy savings and environmental awareness (Gerpott and Paukert, 2013).…”
Section: The Role Of People In Smart Gridsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the evolution process to smart grids, end-users are also expected to have an increasing active role in the management of energy resources as energy co-providers, actively participating in the electricity market (EU, 2013;Foxon, 2013;Geelen et al, 2013;Giordano and Fulli, 2012). This brings a novel dimension to energy behaviours, traditionally only focused on investment, maintenance and usage (Van Raaij and Verhallen, 1983), and to their contribution in promoting energy efficiency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is even exacerbated by the intermittent character of RES. Flexibility in consumption could mitigate this problem and could, based on production, entail that various consumers, generators, and prosumers are pooled to jointly increase their flexibilities [27]. The issues mentioned are just a glimpse of how the electricity system and the electricity sector are changing.…”
Section: The Quest For Novel Modes Of Governance In the Electricity Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Any incentives that utilities provide will be small compared to the societal gains. Unleashing market forces to attract the investment and realize the promise of smarter grid-building integrations means new platforms for delivering energy services [53]. Policymakers can encourage the development of these platforms.…”
Section: How Can Public Policy Encourage the Interaction Of A Smart Gmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Policymakers can proactively address customer resistance and engage "smart users" to realize greater change [55]. Policymakers may proactively address vulnerable groups and those adversely affected by these changes, especially resulting from changes in pricing systems [56,57].…”
Section: How Can Public Policy Encourage the Interaction Of A Smart Gmentioning
confidence: 99%