'A Burden on the County': Madness, Institutions of Confinement and the Irish Patient in Victorian Lancashire

Abstract

This article explores the responses of the Poor Law authorities, asylum superintendents and Lunacy Commissioners to the huge influx of Irish patients into the Lancashire public asylum system, a system facing intense pressure in terms of numbers and costs, in the latter half of the nineteenth century. In particular, it examines the ways in which patients were passed, bartered and exchanged between two sets of institution—workhouses and asylums. In the mid-nineteenth century removal to asylums was advocated for all cases of mental disorder by asylum medical superintendents and the Lunacy Commissioners; by its end, asylum doctors were resisting the attempts of Poor Law officials to ‘dump’ increasing numbers of chronic cases into their wards. The article situates the Irish patient at the centre of tussles between those with a stake in lunacy provision as a group recognised as numerous, disruptive and isolated.

Children, poverty and mental health in rural and urban England (1850–1907)

“…The rapid rate of industrialisation meant that poverty was acutely felt both in the city but also in the rural areas of the county and as such the demand for pauper lunatic provision was high and diverse. The pressures on asylum space in Lancashire were further magnified by the large number of Irish migrants who came to England following the famine of 1845-7 (Cox et al, 2012;Cox et al, 2013;Cox and Marland, 2015). Finally, the Three Counties Asylum catered for the needs of Bedfordshire, Hertfordshire and Huntingdonshire.…”

The Pathologisation of Women Who Kill: Three Cases from Ireland

“…Although Elizabeth benefited from the support of her grown sons, her position as a widow carried with it inherent vulnerability. 112 In contrast, Mary Agnes B.D. 's motherhood was referenced numerous times, and generally in her favour, such as during bail applications.…”

Institutionalising senile dementia in 19th‐century Britain

“…For example, in contrast to the increasingly centralised administration of lunacy in London, the distinctive administrative units which made up the rural county of Devon each took very different approaches to the institutionalisation of their pauper lunatics (Melling and Forsythe ). In industrial Lancashire – second only to London in the scale of its system of confinement – large workhouse lunatic wards provided relief to the pressured asylum system (Cox and Marland ). This article seeks to situate the London experience in a national narrative, drawing from medical texts and administrative reports covering different parts of the UK, but a different geographical case study may produce a revealingly different picture.…”