2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-31154-4_79
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Build-Time Estimator for Additive Manufactured Objects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, the error for the test case F was equal to 14 % of the actual build time, which indicates that the error was not characterised by a well-known trend, meaning the level of confidence of the estimations is low. Moreover, a parametric method such as that adopted in [34] can provide a better estimation of the actual build time while requiring significantly less time for the set-up.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the error for the test case F was equal to 14 % of the actual build time, which indicates that the error was not characterised by a well-known trend, meaning the level of confidence of the estimations is low. Moreover, a parametric method such as that adopted in [34] can provide a better estimation of the actual build time while requiring significantly less time for the set-up.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the cost and time required for PLA sample fabrication were estimated based on the building time on the FDM equipment and the amount of material that was used [ 58 ]. Although there are different cost models associated with AM [ 59 ], direct costs are generally considered derived from raw material consumption, whereas indirect costs are related to 3D printer usage (energy, maintenance, and equipment depreciation).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first is the hypothesis of a perfectly planar profile of the deposed layer. Later studies suggested a more accurate approximation with the B-spline curve [52] or elliptical profiles [53,54].…”
Section: Build Orientationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, surface quality evaluation based on R a does not give inferences useful to finding the build direction that minimizes the stair-stepping effect (the main component of the surface defectiveness) (Figure 1). To this purpose, in [53], the authors suggest to use the index P a [60], that evaluates quality surface better than R a in those cases where the stair-stepping effect is significant, as for the case of Figure 8. The optimization criterion to find the best build direction in terms of surface quality is defined by the following expression:…”
Section: Build Orientationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation