2020
DOI: 10.1080/13696998.2020.1851698
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A budget impact analysis of gilteritinib for the treatment of relapsed or refractoryFLT3mut+acute myeloid leukemia in a US health plan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 51 publications
(70 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because pediatric AML displays a lower mutational burden, it could be argued that FLT3 inhibitors may even be more effective in children than in adults 27 . From a fiscal standpoint, they are also cost‐effective 52 compared to HSCT or salvage chemotherapy 53 . In the context of relatively rare diseases, such as pediatric FLT3‐ITD AML, use of a standard based on “best available evidence” or “reasonable probability” may be more appropriate than requiring phase III, randomized controlled trial‐based proof of efficacy.…”
Section: The Absence Of Evidence Is Not Evidence Of Absence—especially In Pediatric Oncologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because pediatric AML displays a lower mutational burden, it could be argued that FLT3 inhibitors may even be more effective in children than in adults 27 . From a fiscal standpoint, they are also cost‐effective 52 compared to HSCT or salvage chemotherapy 53 . In the context of relatively rare diseases, such as pediatric FLT3‐ITD AML, use of a standard based on “best available evidence” or “reasonable probability” may be more appropriate than requiring phase III, randomized controlled trial‐based proof of efficacy.…”
Section: The Absence Of Evidence Is Not Evidence Of Absence—especially In Pediatric Oncologymentioning
confidence: 99%