1985
DOI: 10.1016/0017-9310(85)90161-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A bubble growth model for nucleate boiling in thin, falling, superheated, laminar, water films

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 13 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The falling film heat transfer enhancement ratios, Kff, where the falling film HTCs at a Γr of approximately 0.13 kg/m/s were compared with the pool-boiling HTCs from our previous study [38] are shown in Figure 15 The polished tube had some of the lowest enhancement ratios, while the roughened tube had some of the highest enhancement ratios. This is consistent with the theory that falling film enhancement is driven by increased microlayer evaporation from trapped and sliding bubbles [8,66]. The greater nucleation site density of the roughened tube compared to the polished tube would allow it to have more sliding bubbles and thus a greater enhancement ratio.…”
Section: Falling Film Heat Transfer Enhancementsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The falling film heat transfer enhancement ratios, Kff, where the falling film HTCs at a Γr of approximately 0.13 kg/m/s were compared with the pool-boiling HTCs from our previous study [38] are shown in Figure 15 The polished tube had some of the lowest enhancement ratios, while the roughened tube had some of the highest enhancement ratios. This is consistent with the theory that falling film enhancement is driven by increased microlayer evaporation from trapped and sliding bubbles [8,66]. The greater nucleation site density of the roughened tube compared to the polished tube would allow it to have more sliding bubbles and thus a greater enhancement ratio.…”
Section: Falling Film Heat Transfer Enhancementsupporting
confidence: 87%