I n a two-stage context, Cerón-Rojas et al. (2019) described and evaluated the unconstrained optimum and decorrelated multistage linear phenotypic selection indices (OMLPSI and DMLPSI, respectively) theory and concluded that OMLPSI efficiency when predicting the net genetic merit was higher than the DMLPSI efficiency and that breeders should use the OMLPSI when making phenotypic selection. The main difference between the two indices is that although the OMLPSI takes into consideration the correlation values among stages when predicting the net genetic merit, the DMLPSI imposes the restriction that the correlation values among stages be null when it makes the prediction. The main characteristic of the OMLPSI (DMLPSI) in a two-stage context is that at Stage 1, OMLPSI (DMLPSI) is a partial index, but at Stage 2, it is a complete index. This selection procedure is called the part and whole index selection method (Young, 1964; Saxton, 1983) and is valid for any number of stages. The OMLPSI (DMLPSI) is more efficient than the independent culling method because it uses all available information at each