1967
DOI: 10.1021/je60033a020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A brief review and table of semiempirical parameters used in the Hueckel molecular orbital method

Abstract: The application of the Huckel Molecular Orbital (HMO) method to the interpretation of experimental results in biochemistry and biology is discussed. Several methods of derivation and application of the semiempirical parameters used in the HMO technique are given, and a table listing the parameter values is included. I N VIEW of the growing interest in the possibility of correlating Hiickel Molecular Orbital (HMO) calculations (38) with biochemical and biological activities (72, 75, 79, 941, and the application… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
110
0

Year Published

1972
1972
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 221 publications
(111 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
110
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The AMBER 7 charges (Cornell et al, 1995) were used as the atomic charges for HSA. The Gasteiger-Hückel charges (Purcel and Singer, 1967;Gasteiger and Marsili, 1980;Gasteiger, 1980, 1981) were used as the charges for CS-866. The cut-off distance for the nonbonded interactions was 10 Å.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The AMBER 7 charges (Cornell et al, 1995) were used as the atomic charges for HSA. The Gasteiger-Hückel charges (Purcel and Singer, 1967;Gasteiger and Marsili, 1980;Gasteiger, 1980, 1981) were used as the charges for CS-866. The cut-off distance for the nonbonded interactions was 10 Å.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The standard rate constant and transfer coefficient were calculated from the abscissa intercept and slope, respectively, of the best straight line through the points. The HMO calculations for the substituted molecules were carried out using the parameters listed in Table 3, the parameters for -C1, -CH3, and -CH30 being taken from the tabulation of Purcell and Singer (14). The -NO2 parameters were based on those used by Brodskii et al (15) but were modified in order to obtain a better fit with the experimental data.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…25 All modeling operations were carried out under the same conditions 26 (alignments: the atom based fit (AF) 27 & the field fit (FF); number of components: 1-5; grid: 1-3 Å; field: the comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA) fields: standard, indicator and H-bond; the comparative molecular similarity indeces analysis (CoMSIA) fields: the electrostatic, the steric, the hydrophobic (logP), the H-bond acceptor and the H-bond donor). The Gästeiger-Hückel charge 28 was used as the partial charge of a particular atom and the AF and FF alignment 29 methods were respectively used as the spatial alignment of substrate molecules in three-dimensional space. AF alignment of the potent energy minimized substrate structures shown in Figure 1.…”
Section: 24mentioning
confidence: 99%