2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0346-251x(03)00045-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A brief overview of individual differences in second language learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
217
0
18

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 366 publications
(261 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
4
217
0
18
Order By: Relevance
“…One such trend is a focus on the various influences of individual differences to learning a L2, which for Ehrman, Leaver and Oxford (2003) is very complex, such that it "meant little conclusive knowledge and thus need for continuing investigation" (p. 313).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One such trend is a focus on the various influences of individual differences to learning a L2, which for Ehrman, Leaver and Oxford (2003) is very complex, such that it "meant little conclusive knowledge and thus need for continuing investigation" (p. 313).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Every type of syllabus involves positive aspects and shortcomings. Additionally, individual teachers and learners might be more suited to any of these types, depending on their cognitive style or other individual differences (Ehrman, Leaver and Oxford, 2003;Winke, 2007). The option put forward by TEFL (Teaching as a Foreign Language) literature is to implement a negotiated or eclectic syllabus (Can, 2012;Kumaravadivelu, 2001Kumaravadivelu, , 2006Nation and Macalister, 2009;Richards, 2013), which does not involve a return to structural grammars or traditional methodologies.…”
Section: Syllabus Design In the Postmethods Eramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, Ehrman et al (2003) came to the conclusion that: a given learning strategy is neither good nor bad; it is necessary neutral until it is considered in context. A strategy is useful under these conditions: (a) the strategy relates well to the second language task at hand, (b) the strategy fits the particular student's learning styles preferences to one degree or another, and (c) the student employs the strategy effectively and links it with other relevant strategies.…”
Section: Learning Strategies Across Culturesmentioning
confidence: 99%