A Brief History of Simulation Neuroscience

Abstract

Our knowledge of the brain has evolved over millennia in philosophical, experimental and theoretical phases. We suggest that the next phase is simulation neuroscience. The main drivers of simulation neuroscience are big data generated at multiple levels of brain organization and the need to integrate these data to trace the causal chain of interactions within and across all these levels. Simulation neuroscience is currently the only methodology for systematically approaching the multiscale brain. In this review, we attempt to reconstruct the deep historical paths leading to simulation neuroscience, from the first observations of the nerve cell to modern efforts to digitally reconstruct and simulate the brain. Neuroscience began with the identification of the neuron as the fundamental unit of brain structure and function and has evolved towards understanding the role of each cell type in the brain, how brain cells are connected to each other, and how the seemingly infinite networks they form give rise to the vast diversity of brain functions. Neuronal mapping is evolving from subjective descriptions of cell types towards objective classes, subclasses and types. Connectivity mapping is evolving from loose topographic maps between brain regions towards dense anatomical and physiological maps of connections between individual genetically distinct neurons. Functional mapping is evolving from psychological and behavioral stereotypes towards a map of behaviors emerging from structural and functional connectomes. We show how industrialization of neuroscience and the resulting large disconnected datasets are generating demand for integrative neuroscience, how the scale of neuronal and connectivity maps is driving digital atlasing and digital reconstruction to piece together the multiple levels of brain organization, and how the complexity of the interactions between molecules, neurons, microcircuits and brain regions is driving brain simulation to understand the interactions in the multiscale brain.

Dense Computer Replica of Cortical Microcircuits Unravels Cellular Underpinnings of Auditory Surprise Response

“…Our "replicate and explain" approach differs from the typical computational route taken to study circuit dynamics, whereby simplified circuit models are constructed to study the dependence of an observed phenomenon, e.g., SSA, on unobserved biophysical parameters 38,39 , for example, synaptic depression. While this classical modeling approach is invaluable for testing specific mechanisms that might explain the observed phenomena, the model is a priori tailored to replicate the phenomenon and, by design, it ignores other putative underlying mechanisms (and the interactions among them) that might impact the studied phenomena 40 .…”

Enabling Large-Scale Simulations With the GENESIS Neuronal Simulator

“…The same model partitioned across 64 cores required only 17 min. For a detailed discussion of several other large-scale simulation efforts, see also (De Garis et al, 2010; Fan and Markram, 2019).…”

Editorial: Shaping Ethical Futures in Brain-Based and Artificial Intelligence Research

“…Concepts developed through work with algorithms, neural networks, and reinforcement learning may provide new approaches that help better understand brain-based intelligence, while artificial neural networks may serve as simulations that provide insights which help to better understand brain processes. Simulation neuroscience, a new research field that aims to build a digital copy of the brain, relies heavily on these interdisciplinary connections and fosters collaborations between researchers from neuroscience and computer science (Markram 2006;Fan and Markram 2019).…”