2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0379-0738(01)00409-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A brief history of forensic entomology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
97
0
16

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 194 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
97
0
16
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar result showed by the previous mitochondrial and nuclear data based research (Dsouli et al 2011). Although Muscidae flies are important insects for the forensic entomology (Benecke 2001), it is hard to identify specimens by morphological examination because of highly similar morphological appearance according to metamorphic stages (Lan et al 2015). Therefore, complete mitochondrial genome sequences can be important tool in forensic entomology for identifying species.…”
supporting
confidence: 81%
“…Similar result showed by the previous mitochondrial and nuclear data based research (Dsouli et al 2011). Although Muscidae flies are important insects for the forensic entomology (Benecke 2001), it is hard to identify specimens by morphological examination because of highly similar morphological appearance according to metamorphic stages (Lan et al 2015). Therefore, complete mitochondrial genome sequences can be important tool in forensic entomology for identifying species.…”
supporting
confidence: 81%
“…Among these, 7 were case reports [13][14][15][16][17][18][19], 3 case series [6,20,21], 19 original articles [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40], 4 were technical notes [41][42][43][44] and 8 were reviews [1,10,[45][46][47][48][49][50].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, entomological books and forensic entomology and pathology manuals [7][8][9][10][11][12], which include chapters dedicated to the description of post-mortem artefacts in death scene, were also included.…”
Section: Review Of the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…the analysis of the postmortem interval is based on the different changes that a corpse suffers after death including: physical processes (body cooling and hypostasis); metabolic processes (supravital reactions); autolysis (loss of selective membrane permeability, diffusion); physicochemical processes (rigor mortis); bacterial processes (putrefaction) [1][2][3][4][5]; and the effect of insect activity [6,7]. according to these processes, the methods of estimating the time since death can be quantitative, like the measurement of body cooling or potassium in vitreous humor [1], or qualitative, such as subjective descriptions of gastric contents [8,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%