2014
DOI: 10.1080/02687038.2014.973360
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A brief assessment of object semantics in primary progressive aphasia

Abstract: Background: A cross-culturally valid nonverbal assessment of semantic knowledge is needed. Accurately identifying impairment of object semantics is important for diagnosis of several disorders, including distinguishing semantic variant primary progressive aphasia (svPPA), a neurodegenerative condition characterised by progressive impairment in word comprehension, from logopenic and nonfluent agrammatic variants, which are not associated with impaired object semantics. However, current assessments require cultu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Normative Data for ages 46-80 (Breining et al, 2015) c Normative Data for ages 75-79 (Crum, Anthony, Bassett, & Folstein, 1993) d…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Normative Data for ages 46-80 (Breining et al, 2015) c Normative Data for ages 75-79 (Crum, Anthony, Bassett, & Folstein, 1993) d…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To characterize language deficits, they completed one of three equivalent forms of Quick Aphasia Battery (QAB; Wilson, Eriksson, Schneck, & Lucanie, ), as well as the Western Aphasia Battery (WAB; Kertesz, ). Because the adaptive semantic matching task depends on comprehension and semantic processing of written words, patients then completed the written word to picture matching subtest of the Comprehensive Aphasia Test (Swinburn et al, ), written word to picture matching using the word comprehension items from another form of the QAB, and a 14‐item short version (Breining et al, ) of the Pyramids and Palm Trees Test (Howard & Patterson, ). In the second and third sessions, the other two forms of the QAB were administered, along with written word to picture matching using QAB items.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Follow-up time points include 3 Weeks (subacute phase), 5 Months (chronic phase), and 1 year (chronic phase) post-stroke. Language tests included: Johns Hopkins University Dysgraphia Regularity sub-test and Parts of Speech sub-test (Beeson & Hillis, 2001; Goodman & Caramazza, 1985), Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination (BDAE-3; Goodglass, Kaplan, & Barresi, 2001), Boston Naming Test (BNT-2; Kaplan, Goodglass, & Weintraub, 2001), Hopkins Assessment of Naming Actions (HANA; Breining, Tippett, et al, 2015), and Pyramids and Palm Trees: Short Form (sPPT; Breining, Lala, et al, 2015). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%