2021
DOI: 10.3390/biom12010035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Brief Analysis of Proteomic Profile Changes during Zebrafish Regeneration

Abstract: Unlike mammals, zebrafish are capable to regenerate many of their organs, however, the response of tissue damage varies across tissues. Understanding the molecular mechanism behind the robust regenerative capacity in a model organism may help to identify and develop novel treatment strategies for mammals (including humans). Hence, we systematically analyzed the current literature on the proteome profile collected from different regenerated zebrafish tissues. Our analyses underlining that several proteins and p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 52 publications
(82 reference statements)
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Differentially expressed proteins reported in each study were included in the joint dataset with the following criteria: (1) Proteomic studies of adult patients with DR or DME; (2) proteins were only counted once for each study with multiple spot identifications or evaluated in a different proteomic technology; (3) proteins were included if the expression levels were changed at least 50% compared to control levels [17]. Data sets of proteins were excluded if proteomic results reported in the study exhibited fold changes between 0.8 and 1.2 unless the p-value was significant.…”
Section: Data Extraction and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differentially expressed proteins reported in each study were included in the joint dataset with the following criteria: (1) Proteomic studies of adult patients with DR or DME; (2) proteins were only counted once for each study with multiple spot identifications or evaluated in a different proteomic technology; (3) proteins were included if the expression levels were changed at least 50% compared to control levels [17]. Data sets of proteins were excluded if proteomic results reported in the study exhibited fold changes between 0.8 and 1.2 unless the p-value was significant.…”
Section: Data Extraction and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%