2017
DOI: 10.17161/1808.25571
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Bridge to Challenging Environmental Inequality: Intersectionality, Environmental Justice, and Disaster Vulnerability

Abstract: Abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such an intersection framework would account for citizens' race, class (income), gender, ethnicity, disability and other inequalities. In his study on the interaction of global and national social inequality with the effectiveness of governmental response to environmental degradation Jeffrey Sachs (2015: 45-70) supports Ryder's (2017) suggestion.…”
Section: Democracy In Time Of Disaster and Environmental Challengesmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such an intersection framework would account for citizens' race, class (income), gender, ethnicity, disability and other inequalities. In his study on the interaction of global and national social inequality with the effectiveness of governmental response to environmental degradation Jeffrey Sachs (2015: 45-70) supports Ryder's (2017) suggestion.…”
Section: Democracy In Time Of Disaster and Environmental Challengesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Therefore, looking at the data on the effects of environmental disasters on local communities, Stacia Ryder (2017) proposes to include roots of social inequality in environmental solutions. Even though vulnerability to environmental disasters is discussed primarily in terms of environmental justice, the intersectional framework of addressing the roots of social inequality while focusing on environmental justice would lead to a better understanding of environmental harms and disaster vulnerabilities, argues Ryder (2017). Therefore, it will generate more just and equitable planning, preparedness, response and recovery activities.…”
Section: Democracy In Time Of Disaster and Environmental Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intersectionality has been used as a framework to merge disaster vulnerability with environmental justice (Ryder, 2017). An intersectional approach to disaster preparedness and response ensures that all groups are meaningfully included or considered in planning and decision-making processes; however, in many countries around the world, this is not yet realized.…”
Section: Non-discriminationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reducing social vulnerability and enhancing both social and environmental justice go together (Cutter 2012;Ryder 2017;Shrestha et al 2019;Sotolongo, Kuhl and Baker 2021): they involve challenging the political and development decisions that lead to inequalities of risk (Arifeen and Eriksen 2020;Fraser et al 2020). The complex drivers of risk are rooted and perpetuated through poor development practices, through exposure to hazard events and ongoing poor risk governance.…”
Section: Socio-physical Disasters (Are Not Natural!)mentioning
confidence: 99%