2006 International Conference on Service Systems and Service Management 2006
DOI: 10.1109/icsssm.2006.320765
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Branch and Cut method for the Capacitated Location-Routing Problem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
83
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
83
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Belenguer et al [5] introduced a two-index integer programming formulation and families of valid inequalities. They were able to solve instances with up to 50 customers.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Belenguer et al [5] introduced a two-index integer programming formulation and families of valid inequalities. They were able to solve instances with up to 50 customers.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This effect can be seen when analyzing clustered instances such as the ones described in Belenguer et al. () and Akca et al. ().…”
Section: Analysis Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…As a final conclusion to this section, we note that another set of undirected path elimination constraints is presented by Belenguer et al , however they are based on a different set of binary variables to model two‐node cycles. For this reason, a direct comparison between their inequalities and inequalities (30) and (31) is not straightforward and requires further investigation.…”
Section: Routing Problems With Multiple Depotsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…This section is motivated by the formulations described in the two papers by Belenguer et al and Benavent and Martínez‐Sykora where no information is given on the value of the degree of the depot nodes. We first observe that solutions composed by chains such as ( d 1 , i 1 , , i m , d 2 ) , where d 1 and d 2 are two different depots and i 1 , , i m are clients, are feasible for the models proposed by Belenguer et al and Benavent and Martínez‐Sykora without the path elimination constraints. However, such solutions are not feasible for the generic model proposed in Section 2 without the path elimination constraints, since the assignment constraints (1) and (2) require that, for each depot, the in‐degree and the out‐degree must be equal to one another.…”
Section: Routing Problems With Multiple Depotsmentioning
confidence: 99%