2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2020.04.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A branch-and-cut algorithm for the generalized traveling salesman problem with time windows

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using the example introduced previously and depicted in Figure 1, it can be observed that Constraints (14) do not cut the solution proposed in Note that this result can be extended to routing problems with time windows (TW) as the generalized TSPTW (Yuan et al (2018)), the vehicle routing problem with TW (VRPTW) (Pecin et al…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Using the example introduced previously and depicted in Figure 1, it can be observed that Constraints (14) do not cut the solution proposed in Note that this result can be extended to routing problems with time windows (TW) as the generalized TSPTW (Yuan et al (2018)), the vehicle routing problem with TW (VRPTW) (Pecin et al…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…We refer to Afsar et al [2014] for details on the GVRP, and to Moccia et al [2012] for details of the GVRPTW. Yuan et al [2018] develop a B&C for the GTSPTW (a single vehicle GVRPTW) that can solve instances with 30 clusters. Moccia et al [2012] propose a tabu search that is able to tackle instances with 120 clusters within few minutes.…”
Section: Delivery Optionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At that time, their order in the array that is sorted in ascending order represent the cities. For example the consisting 6 cities has the values of = [1.5, 6.3, 4.6, 5.7, 8.9, 4.0], the real tour of the is determined by _ = [1,6,3,4,2,5]. In which, the 1 st city is assigned for the first variable because it has the smallest value in the .…”
Section: Application Aeo For Finding the Shortest Tour Of The Tsp 31 Solution Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the first time proposed in 1970 [3], the TSP problem has been solved by difference approaches consisting of the exacting methods such as branch-and-cut [4], branch-and-bound [5], Lagrangian [6] and the methods relied on the metaheuristic algorithms such as genetic algorithm (GA) [7]- [9], particle swarm optimization (PSO) [10]- [12], ant colony optimization (ACO) [13]- [16] cuckoo search (CS) [17], [18]. Generally, each group of approaches has certain advantages and limitations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%