2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.mcm.2009.12.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A branch and bound algorithm for single machine scheduling with deteriorating values of jobs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the optimal global solution can be obtained, it is only applicable to simple small-scale problems, with a large amount of calculation, high computational complexity, relatively slow solution speed, and strong dependence on the problem. [15][16][17] As most scheduling problems are NP-hard problems, it is impossible to find the exact solution of the scheduling problem by the polynomial algorithm. Therefore, most researches on flexible flow shop scheduling focus on the approximation methods, including heuristic algorithm and meta-heuristic algorithm.…”
Section: Comparison Of Workhop Scheduling Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the optimal global solution can be obtained, it is only applicable to simple small-scale problems, with a large amount of calculation, high computational complexity, relatively slow solution speed, and strong dependence on the problem. [15][16][17] As most scheduling problems are NP-hard problems, it is impossible to find the exact solution of the scheduling problem by the polynomial algorithm. Therefore, most researches on flexible flow shop scheduling focus on the approximation methods, including heuristic algorithm and meta-heuristic algorithm.…”
Section: Comparison Of Workhop Scheduling Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computational results reveal that near-optimal solutions are achieved for a large number of problems. Janiak et al (2009) Finally, Voutsinas and Pappis (2010) add the B&B procedure to their earlier, near-optimal, job-sorting algorithm (2002) and determine optimal solutions. Results indicate a reduction in computation times, particularly as the number of jobs grow.…”
Section: Deteriorating Job Valuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beginning with two-step, core and allocation algorithm, heuristics have played an increasingly critical role in achieving near-optimal solutions to moderate and larger scale problems that can incorporate complexities and stochastic parameters. The heuristic procedures appear to be of several types: (1) extensions of RMRP/ MMRP applications, particularly the algorithm; (2) combining queuing analysis and computer simulation; (3) blending an IP formulation with LP relaxation, sub-problem generation and their solutions, and a feasibility reassurance procedure; (4) calculus-based procedures; (5) multi-stage algorithms typically including MP or total inventory-related cost formulations with Lagrangian relaxation, sub-problem decomposition, sub-problem solutions, and feasible reaggregation; and (6) other unique procedures (e.g., variant process planning (Veerakamolmal and Gupta 1998), sorting (Voutsinas and Pappis 2002), pairwise interchange (Stanfield, King, and Hodson 2006), testing multiple algorithms and selecting the best solution (e.g., Raut, Gupta and Swami 2008;Teunter, Tang, and Kaparis 2009), and combining sorting algorithms with a second-stage B&B solution procedure (Voutsinas and Pappis 2010)). …”
Section: Complexities Uncertainties and Stochasticitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scheduling literature describes the deterioration of jobs in two different ways. The first way is to define jobs whose processing times increase as their delays for processing increase (Voutsinas and Pappis, 2010). Most work in the area of deteriorating jobs focused on this description (Wang et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%